A very important point here.....

Check out this video.....which has screened at the White House....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/03/20/white-house-film-festival-features-climate-change-movie-made-by-6-year-old/

This kid really DOES represent the Democrat (Marxist) Party. At 6 years old, he has neither the experience nor the vision to comprehend the climate of a planet, particularly in terms of whether human interaction has any affect.

This, in truth, IS the Democrat Party, who are, fundamentally, 6 year olds in arrested psychological, intellectual and emotional development.

This child, who was clearly brought up by breathtakingly ignorant parents, is now paraded like a circus geek or court jester in front of their king (Obama).

And Democrats fawn and swoon. And they celebrate the product of their agenda; ignorance by age 6.

C'mon, folks.......IT'S A SMOKESCREEN!!!!!

"Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain".....so goes the saying, from "The wizard of Oz".

Who is the "man" behind this curtain? Hillary, of course.

And, of course, I'm talking about the flap, the hype, the petition, the teeth-gnashing, the apoplexy surrounding the open letter to Iran.

This is smokescreen.

And it attempts to distract from, oh, a whole raft of Liberal nightmares; from Hillary's emails, to her lies about email exchanges with Bill, to the continuing revelations about Benghazi, to the complete failure of the economy, blah, blah, blah......

Folks: stay on point. Stay focused. This is what Liberals do.

....because the Liberal media, when not outright burying it, will be condemning and confabulating about this historic, brilliant, elegantly simple speech...

http://youtu.be/lELXynhbS84

No WONDER Democrats.....and Obama, in particular....hates him:

He is clear
He is concise
He is a powerful, commanding presence
He speaks plainly
He has conviction

....and he doesn't require a TelePrompTer

Please, share this post. It's important that folks understand what is at stake.

Please.....

I can't think of a greater endorsement for Walker's Conservative credentials.....

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/ex-mccain-adviser-calls-walker-dumb-a/?cat_orig=politics

2016

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/hillary-knew-emails-during-benghazi-attack-reported-terrorism/

Going into the 2016 election cycle

Every election cycle, I hear the same thing:

IF YOU REPUBLICANS WANT TO HAVE A CHANCE OF WINNING, YOU'D BETTER NOMINATE A MODERATE!

I hear it from the media.
I hear it from Liberals (who are CLEARLY just trying to help me...and Republicans...out...).
I hear it, even, from "moderate" Republicans.

And, I'm certain that the majority of Americans hear the same thing, repeated, ad nauseam.

But, as FAR too many things "media", FAR too many things "moderate" and nearly EVERYTHING Liberal, the notion that a Conservative cannot win the Presidency is, in a word:

BULLSHIT.

The greatest modern example? President Reagan, of course.

Now, while it CAN be reasonably argued that Reagan won in 1980 in reaction to President Carter who, by any reasonable standard, was an epic failure as a President, it does not explain how, in 1984, Reagan, who, by that time, had established his credentials as a true Conservative, won his bid for reelection.

So lopsided was Reagan's victory over Mondale (in 1984) that no other word could possibly apply other than "mandate".

By electoral vote:

1980 election:
Reagan: 489 electoral votes
Carter: 49 electoral votes

1984 election:
Reagan: 525 electoral votes
Mondale: 13 electoral votes

So, AFTER establishing himself as a Conservative, Reagan had a HIGHER electoral gain than his previous election win.

So.....AMERICAN VOTERS.....the record is absolutely clear: put a REAL Conservative against a Democrat, and the Conservative WILL win.

And the reverse, as seen by the last two elections, the opposite is true:

Obama vs McCain (who is a left-of-center moderate Republican):
Obama: 365 electoral votes
McCain: 173 electoral votes

Obama vs Romney (who is a right-of-center moderate Republican):
Obama: 201 electoral votes
Romney: 191 electoral votes

Even in the last two elections, the more Right-leaning the Republican candidate, the more electoral votes.

The bottom line is this:

The more Conservative the Presidential candidate, the more electoral votes garnered by the Republican Party. The more "moderate" and left-leaning the candidate, the fewer electoral votes for the Republican.

Why on Earth fair-minded voters listen to Liberals in the media, the Democrat Party and in the Republican Party is beyond my capacity to understand.

So, as the 2016 election season ramps up, I hope that you will keep these things in mind. And, I hope that you will dedicate yourselves to taking a stand:

- In favor of the Constitution
- In favor of Conservative principles
- In favor of American exceptionalism
- In favor of the family
- In favor of freedom
- In favor of Liberty
- In favor of our GOD-BESTOWED unalienable rights (worth reading: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/09/23/what-did-thomas-jefferson-mean-by-unalienable-rights/)

Because, if you are NOT in favor of these or are disinterested in defending these, then you WILL lose them.

America, folks, ISN'T just another country.

Rather, it is a shared vision of Liberty, which must be defended constantly from those, externally and internally, who seek to destroy that vision.

And, of all the forces allied against that vision, the most dangerous is The Democrat Party, who are Marxists, Statists, who seek to do to America what Communists did to the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, etc....

Is that REALLY the legacy you wish to leave to your children?

Well.....how about that?!

ANOTHER Democrat with a gun...

If Americans want to TRULY reduce gun violence, there is only one law that would make any sense:

DON'T ALLOW DEMOCRATS TO OWN OR POSSESS GUNS!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/02/11/vehement-atheist-charged-with-executing-3-muslims-students/

You DO know what's coming, don't you?

With all the (made up) flap about the Oscars.....dumb ol' Al Sharpton (who's as much a reverend as I am an admiral..), once again, attempting to "Brawley" another phony racial crime, I' truly surprised that I haven't yet seen the freight train that's heading our way.

To what do I refer?

Here's what's coming:

In future Oscars, there will be some added categories:

- Best black actor
- Best black actress
- Best black director
- Best screenplay, written by a black
- Best picture with predominantly black cast
- Best supporting black actor and actress
- Best black this, best black that, etc, etc, etc....

Now, the discrimination that pervades our American culture, from "Black history month" to B.E.T. to the Congressional Black Caucus, will be making its way to Hollywood awards.

The most pathetic and ironic thing?

Dr. Martin Luther King would be disgusted by this, as he only desired (rightly) equality.

But, sadly, Democrats have taken his message and turned it into a justification for EXACTLY the kind of discrimination Dr. King dreamed of ending.

You want hypocrisy? You want racism? You want sexism?

I give you THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!

Hollywood, which is about 99.999999999% Liberal Democrat, have released the Oscars list.

While, for the most, I pay absolutely NO attention to the "Hollywood blows Hollywood" award ceremony, this year's is, at least, mildly interesting......but only because it demonstrates the truth of The Democrat Party:

THEY are the "Party of racism".
THEY are the "Party of sexism".
THEY are the party of hypocrisy.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscars-acting-nominees-all-white-764018

And it doesn't end there....

Turns out that the nominees for "best Director".....are ALL MALES!!!!!!

Sorry, Angelina. Maybe your chumming for the wrong side.

Ya know......they kinda have a point......

The idiots in the Left Wing are refusing to characterize the attacks in France as acts of ISLAMIC terrorism. Like the Democrats' psychotic "workplace violence" claim for the Fort Hood incident, the acts of Islamic terrorism in France are being characterized as anything but.

They aren't Islamists.
This isn't about Islam.

But, in truth (and they'll probably find this out too late), the Liberals DO have point.

These radical ISLAMISTS are only doing what Liberals do: taking something fundamental and applying Marx to it.

Radical Islam works off the Socialist playbook, pure and simple. Stalin and Hitler did it; in their cases, they replaced God with State (like what's happening in America right now...). But the bottom line is that it's about control.....ABSOLUTE control. And the methods to achieve that control are spelled out in any Socialist propaganda sheet.....from the Al Qaeda handbook to "Rules for Radicals". And the followers have ranged from Osama bin Laden to Bill Ayers.

So you see, all these mischaracterizations AREN'T particularly inaccurate.....

We MUST consider the fact that ALL these idiots have one thing in common:

They are STATISTS.

Whether you call them Fascists, Communists, Socialists, Progressives, Liberals or The Democrat Party, they are STATISTS.

Want to win the war on terror?

Defeat STATISM.