In addition
to their staunch support of all manner of legislated discrimination, from
abortion to federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, to Affirmative
Action, to “gay rights”, to “women’s rights”, etc, I’d like to present ANOTHER
textbook example of how Democrats are flat out lying when they carp about the
Parties “switching sides”:
John
Dingell.
Dingell,
the longest-serving member of Congress, is a classic example of Liberalism, the
Liberal mindset and the Democrat Party as it has ALWAYS been and CONTINUES to
be.
If you take
time to read the attached article, it is crystal clear that Dingell is
suggesting that the “smaller” states (less populated) should have NO say
whatsoever in national matters (like….the Presidency). Further, Dingell
suggests that, at least where elections are concerned, the First Amendment
should be set aside and The People should have NO say.
Dingell
goes on the state, clearly and highlighted, that America should END “minority
rule” in our Legislative and Executive branches.
In other
words: Dingell wants:
1. Mob rule. One Party has
the majority, the other has no say whatsoever. Let’s be clear about something:
Dingell makes these statements, KNOWING that blacks, for instance, comprise
around 13% of the population. He is, therefore, stating that blacks should have
NO SAY in governmental matters; laws, elections, etc.
2. ALL power, all decision
making, all governance to be consolidated and decided in the most populous
states. Sorry, Ohio (for instance), you have NO SAY in elections. Nor do YOU,
North Dakota, Arizona, Colorado, etc. Dingell wants a country ruled by
California, New York, Florida and Texas.
3. Abolishment of the First
Amendment. Yes, campaign contributions are a First Amendment protection, and
Dingell wants to do away with them (by making them publicly-funded). In fact,
if you think about what he is suggesting in his other statements, it is clear
that he wants the MAJORITY PARTY in Government to decide to whom campaign
monies go; the minority Party would have no say. Period.
Yes, folks, what Dingell is suggesting is that
America be PERMANENTLY ruled by one Party, who would possess 100% power and
100% authority; authoritarian rule.
(My guess is that Dingell wouldn’t feel quite the
same if Republicans had held the House in 2018.)
Dingell, and all those who believe as he does….which
IS the Democrat Party, past AND present…are a danger to our Republic. A danger,
folks, about which we were warned by the Framers of our Constitution. In fact,
from BEFORE the beginning of our Nation, when the Declaration of Independence was
drafted, our Framers KNEW the enemy when they saw them: “But when a long train of abuses and
usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw
off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
The pure despotism
envisioned by Dingell and, frankly, sought by the Democrat Party, is WHY the
Bill of Rights exists; to RESTRICT the reach of Government and ensure that The
People retain ultimate control. The right to vote, along with The Second
Amendment, are the tools that back that power. And what Dingell desires…..what
the Democrat Party desires…is the abolishment of those tools.
If Dingell REALLY wants to abolish something, how
about he advocate to abolish the first sentence in the Seventeenth Amendment?
Let’s go back to how the Senate was SUPPOSED to be seated: as appointed by the
governors of each state. Or how about abolishing the Federal income tax?
How about it, Dingell?
