a. Asked for it, or
b. Refused to do anything substantive about it.....
We have Hank Johnson (DEMOCRAT - Ga) making a speech calling for legislation specifically designed to limit the First Amendment.
Dem Rep Calls for Constitutional Amendment to Limit Speech
Setting aside, for a moment, his suberbly captivating speaking skills (obviously a product of public schooling), Johnson is really only the latest DEMOCRAT to call for limits to free speech which, curiously, is always and only directed toward Conservatives.
In history, there IS precedent for this. This is NOTHING new, folks.
EVERY statist government, from Hitler to Stalin to Mao to Pot, limited free speech.
The results are obvious.
So, really, the question is this:
WHAT ARE YOU PREPARED TO DO ABOUT IT?
Hirota: NOT free-speech-limited.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Saturday, December 1, 2012
OMG......WHY NOT!?!
Susan Rice.....John Kerry......
Seriously, folks, WHO CARES?
Is one going to REALLY be better than the other?
They are EQUALLY incompetent.
They are EQUALLY un-accomplished.
They are EQUALLY gutless, spineless and brown-nosed.
So what does it REALLY matter who gets the slot?
PEOPLE: GET IT STRAIGHT! You LOST the election. This WAS a CLEAR mandate.
Let the Democrats do whatever they want.
If they want to install history's LEAST competent officers to manage the take-down of America, why should you attempt to stand in the way?
After all, YOU installed history's LEAST competent President.....
Hirota: out.
Seriously, folks, WHO CARES?
Is one going to REALLY be better than the other?
They are EQUALLY incompetent.
They are EQUALLY un-accomplished.
They are EQUALLY gutless, spineless and brown-nosed.
So what does it REALLY matter who gets the slot?
PEOPLE: GET IT STRAIGHT! You LOST the election. This WAS a CLEAR mandate.
Let the Democrats do whatever they want.
If they want to install history's LEAST competent officers to manage the take-down of America, why should you attempt to stand in the way?
After all, YOU installed history's LEAST competent President.....
Hirota: out.
Gosh....another "gun-free zone" campus shooting....
I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND CRIMINALS!
Why on earth would a criminal choose a "gun free" campus in order to fulfill their life's ambition of killing a bunch of people?
Don't they realize that, if they got caught with a gun on campus, they COULD be arrested?
Jeeeeez.....
Folks, we wanted it. We got it. Whether through action or lack thereof, WE wanted campuses to be gun-free.
GOD forbid some moron with a gun, intent on killing others (KNOWING THAT THEY WON'T BE ARMED), is stopped....VIOLENTLY AND PERMANENTLY....by someone LEGALLY carrying a gun on campus....
.....OR ANYWHERE, FOR THAT MATTER!?!?!?
Hirota: out.
Why on earth would a criminal choose a "gun free" campus in order to fulfill their life's ambition of killing a bunch of people?
Don't they realize that, if they got caught with a gun on campus, they COULD be arrested?
Jeeeeez.....
Folks, we wanted it. We got it. Whether through action or lack thereof, WE wanted campuses to be gun-free.
GOD forbid some moron with a gun, intent on killing others (KNOWING THAT THEY WON'T BE ARMED), is stopped....VIOLENTLY AND PERMANENTLY....by someone LEGALLY carrying a gun on campus....
.....OR ANYWHERE, FOR THAT MATTER!?!?!?
Hirota: out.
"Tongue-in-cheek" prediction...
But,, it's only a LITTLE BIT tongue-in-cheek....
Mel Reynolds is running for Jesse Jackson, Jr's Congressional seat. Jesse, that chip off the old block, is resigning due to "mental health issues" and, oh by the way, an intensive FBI investigation, which is currently running.
(Ya know, for me, I'm am ever relieved and comforted that our president comes from a political town KNOWN for its honesty, integrity and morals....)
Anyhoo, back to Mel.....
Reynolds USED to hold a Congressional seat. In fact, it's the same Congressional seat currently...well...formally...occupied by Jackson, Jr.
Reynold LOST that seat NOT in an election, but rather a CONVICTION.
Seems he's a convicted sex offender (or in Liberal parlance: "one of the boys"). And he did time for it (probably on the same cell block as the rest of Chicago's Democratic Party politicians....).
Well, not only is Reynolds a convicted sex offender (he had sex with an underage...16...campaign worker), but he's also convicted of misusing campaign funds (maybe he tried to use them to pay the 16 year old off...who knows....).
And now, he's running for office.
Which, to me, makes perfect sense. He DOES, after all, have the proper credentials (for Liberals):
- He's black
- He's been convicted of a crime (the fact that he's convicted of a MAJOR FELONY gives him HUGE points for Liberals)
- He's black
- He's abused campaign funds
- He's black
- And, finally......he's black.
So....here's my prediction:
Based on his felony conviction, campaign fund abuse and his "blackness", I think he's going to give Hillary a SERIOUS run in 2016!
(Imagine THAT Cabinet: Alcee Hastings, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel and he'll bring back William Jeffereson.
Hirota: out.
Mel Reynolds is running for Jesse Jackson, Jr's Congressional seat. Jesse, that chip off the old block, is resigning due to "mental health issues" and, oh by the way, an intensive FBI investigation, which is currently running.
(Ya know, for me, I'm am ever relieved and comforted that our president comes from a political town KNOWN for its honesty, integrity and morals....)
Anyhoo, back to Mel.....
Reynolds USED to hold a Congressional seat. In fact, it's the same Congressional seat currently...well...formally...occupied by Jackson, Jr.
Reynold LOST that seat NOT in an election, but rather a CONVICTION.
Seems he's a convicted sex offender (or in Liberal parlance: "one of the boys"). And he did time for it (probably on the same cell block as the rest of Chicago's Democratic Party politicians....).
Well, not only is Reynolds a convicted sex offender (he had sex with an underage...16...campaign worker), but he's also convicted of misusing campaign funds (maybe he tried to use them to pay the 16 year old off...who knows....).
And now, he's running for office.
Which, to me, makes perfect sense. He DOES, after all, have the proper credentials (for Liberals):
- He's black
- He's been convicted of a crime (the fact that he's convicted of a MAJOR FELONY gives him HUGE points for Liberals)
- He's black
- He's abused campaign funds
- He's black
- And, finally......he's black.
So....here's my prediction:
Based on his felony conviction, campaign fund abuse and his "blackness", I think he's going to give Hillary a SERIOUS run in 2016!
(Imagine THAT Cabinet: Alcee Hastings, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel and he'll bring back William Jeffereson.
Hirota: out.
Friday, November 30, 2012
The ugly truth
It is said, of alcoholics and drug addicts, that the only true path to sobriety happens AFTER the person hits rock bottom.
With regard to the fiscal cliff, Republicans should simply walk away from the process, leaving the Democrats to do with our dollars ANYTHING they wish.
Is this surrender? Is this raising the white flag?
Certainly not.
Rather, it is the realization that America is now a drug-dependent society; that drug being government handouts.
And, like ANY other form of addiction, the ONLY path to sobriety begins when the bottom has been reached.
Surrender? No.
Expediting the true American reformation?
ABSOLUTELY.
Hirota: out.
With regard to the fiscal cliff, Republicans should simply walk away from the process, leaving the Democrats to do with our dollars ANYTHING they wish.
Is this surrender? Is this raising the white flag?
Certainly not.
Rather, it is the realization that America is now a drug-dependent society; that drug being government handouts.
And, like ANY other form of addiction, the ONLY path to sobriety begins when the bottom has been reached.
Surrender? No.
Expediting the true American reformation?
ABSOLUTELY.
Hirota: out.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Woo-HOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....headline of the year!
We're number one! We're number one!!!!!
STUDY: CA WORST-GOVERNED STATE IN AMERICA
More on this in a later post......
Guess who???
Ok, folks.....
Recently (today), some wonderful, supportive, admiring and inspiring quotes were made about Obama's big win.
Please read the quotes below and guess who said them:
"We meet on the heels of an enormous people’s victory. It was a long and bitterly contested battle in which the forces of inclusive democracy came out on top. The better angels of the American people spread their wings"
“If anything the vote … is an insistent call for action on the most pressing problems facing the working class and people. That is the election’s mandate. This was not a vote in favor of destroying social programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; or rolling back domestic spending; or resolving the budget crisis on the people’s backs. It was instead a vote for jobs, housing relief, health care, withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan, an end to U.S.-led wars in the Middle East, preservation of the social safety net, health care access, reproductive rights, and equal pay for women, infrastructure renewal (an issue that took on greater importance after megastorm Sandy), marriage equality, a larger commitment to public education, a tax system in which the wealthiest families and corporations pay a much larger share, reform of our punitive and anti-democratic immigration laws, a reduction in unconscionable inequality, a legislative and electoral system that isn’t awash with corporate money.”
“Our contribution was both ideological and practical. Nearly every member and leader was involved. Our work gives us much to build on as we throw ourselves into the post-election battles. In every state and city our political relationships are broader and deeper; our presence and prestige are on a new level."
“While many things went into Obama’s victory, what was notable was the ability of the democratic movement to turn back Republican efforts to suppress the vote; what was of great import was the determination of the people’s movement (with labor in the lead) to reach, educate, and turn out tens of millions of American voters on Election Day; what not surprising was the continuing, strategic, and sometimes underappreciated role of the African American people (93 per cent voted for the president) in the front ranks (at the head in many instances) of the struggle for progress and democracy.”
“The president is the most popular politician in the country. Nobody has the political and moral authority that he has. He isn’t a radical, but by the same token to classify him as a run-of-the-mill capitalist politician doesn’t fit either. Of the Democratic Party presidents of the 20th century, none had the deep democratic sensibilities that he possesses. It is crucial that he lead this struggle but he can’t and won’t do it alone. He needs a mass movement that will nudge him forward as well as have his back as he goes up against recalcitrant Republicans, big sections of monopoly capital, and wavering centrist Democrats in Congress in this and in subsequent battles.”
“Our main task is to build broad people’s unity, guarantee the participation of the key social and class forces, counter the right-wing narrative with a working-class and people’s narrative, and bring forward an alternative program. What stood out in the election was the power of unity and diversity. That may seem contradictory, but it was the interaction of the two that turned what could have been a defeat into a people’s victory. Had Latinos not voted in such significant numbers in Nevada, Colorado and Florida, it is hard to see the president’s path to victory. Had African Americans not turned out in record numbers it is tough to see how the president could have won in most of the battleground states. Had labor not mobilized its membership to vote in Ohio and other Rust Belt states, it’s a stretch to see the president emerging triumphant on election night. Likewise, had single young women not cast their ballots in large numbers, it is difficult to visualize his victory.”
“It is easy to dismiss white people, including white workers, as not only racist, but also backward on a range of issues, such as peace, gun control, reproductive rights, gay marriage, and so forth. Looking at the white vote in this election provides ample evidence for this claim. Worse still, close to 65 percent of white men cast their vote for Romney. What motivated them can’t be reduced to race alone. A substantial number of white people, I’m sure, bought the idea that in an underperforming economy Romney would be a better steward than the president. And there were other issues that motivated them to vote for Romney as well. But, at the same time, for many of them, racism must have either taken up the biggest space in or is closely entwined with the bundle of resentments and wrong understandings that accounts for their voting behavior.”
Long-winded?
Hell, yes. But, it should be noted that, when some Christians are "filled with the Holy Spirit", they, too, speak in tongues....
Back to the point: Who said all these worship-filled words? Who provided this inspiration for the future of America? Who is SO very excited that his vision is fully and finally in reach????
The answer:
SAM WEBB.
Who's Sam Webb?
SAM WEBB IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, USA.
Hirota: out.
Recently (today), some wonderful, supportive, admiring and inspiring quotes were made about Obama's big win.
Please read the quotes below and guess who said them:
"We meet on the heels of an enormous people’s victory. It was a long and bitterly contested battle in which the forces of inclusive democracy came out on top. The better angels of the American people spread their wings"
“If anything the vote … is an insistent call for action on the most pressing problems facing the working class and people. That is the election’s mandate. This was not a vote in favor of destroying social programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; or rolling back domestic spending; or resolving the budget crisis on the people’s backs. It was instead a vote for jobs, housing relief, health care, withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan, an end to U.S.-led wars in the Middle East, preservation of the social safety net, health care access, reproductive rights, and equal pay for women, infrastructure renewal (an issue that took on greater importance after megastorm Sandy), marriage equality, a larger commitment to public education, a tax system in which the wealthiest families and corporations pay a much larger share, reform of our punitive and anti-democratic immigration laws, a reduction in unconscionable inequality, a legislative and electoral system that isn’t awash with corporate money.”
“Our contribution was both ideological and practical. Nearly every member and leader was involved. Our work gives us much to build on as we throw ourselves into the post-election battles. In every state and city our political relationships are broader and deeper; our presence and prestige are on a new level."
“While many things went into Obama’s victory, what was notable was the ability of the democratic movement to turn back Republican efforts to suppress the vote; what was of great import was the determination of the people’s movement (with labor in the lead) to reach, educate, and turn out tens of millions of American voters on Election Day; what not surprising was the continuing, strategic, and sometimes underappreciated role of the African American people (93 per cent voted for the president) in the front ranks (at the head in many instances) of the struggle for progress and democracy.”
“The president is the most popular politician in the country. Nobody has the political and moral authority that he has. He isn’t a radical, but by the same token to classify him as a run-of-the-mill capitalist politician doesn’t fit either. Of the Democratic Party presidents of the 20th century, none had the deep democratic sensibilities that he possesses. It is crucial that he lead this struggle but he can’t and won’t do it alone. He needs a mass movement that will nudge him forward as well as have his back as he goes up against recalcitrant Republicans, big sections of monopoly capital, and wavering centrist Democrats in Congress in this and in subsequent battles.”
“Our main task is to build broad people’s unity, guarantee the participation of the key social and class forces, counter the right-wing narrative with a working-class and people’s narrative, and bring forward an alternative program. What stood out in the election was the power of unity and diversity. That may seem contradictory, but it was the interaction of the two that turned what could have been a defeat into a people’s victory. Had Latinos not voted in such significant numbers in Nevada, Colorado and Florida, it is hard to see the president’s path to victory. Had African Americans not turned out in record numbers it is tough to see how the president could have won in most of the battleground states. Had labor not mobilized its membership to vote in Ohio and other Rust Belt states, it’s a stretch to see the president emerging triumphant on election night. Likewise, had single young women not cast their ballots in large numbers, it is difficult to visualize his victory.”
“It is easy to dismiss white people, including white workers, as not only racist, but also backward on a range of issues, such as peace, gun control, reproductive rights, gay marriage, and so forth. Looking at the white vote in this election provides ample evidence for this claim. Worse still, close to 65 percent of white men cast their vote for Romney. What motivated them can’t be reduced to race alone. A substantial number of white people, I’m sure, bought the idea that in an underperforming economy Romney would be a better steward than the president. And there were other issues that motivated them to vote for Romney as well. But, at the same time, for many of them, racism must have either taken up the biggest space in or is closely entwined with the bundle of resentments and wrong understandings that accounts for their voting behavior.”
Long-winded?
Hell, yes. But, it should be noted that, when some Christians are "filled with the Holy Spirit", they, too, speak in tongues....
Back to the point: Who said all these worship-filled words? Who provided this inspiration for the future of America? Who is SO very excited that his vision is fully and finally in reach????
The answer:
SAM WEBB.
Who's Sam Webb?
SAM WEBB IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, USA.
Hirota: out.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Funny.....
Of course, I'm catching ALL kinds of flak from my Liberal friends, who are rolling their kill....
But, I have to admit....I find it kind of funny.
After all, these folks (most of whom live in California) are going to be paying at LEAST 2% MORE in their state income tax....because of their "win".
AND, they'll be paying MORE in other taxes in order to cover more public schooling.....because of their "win".
I have to wonder whether they'll be laughing while they collect unemployment....
Hirota: scratching my head....
But, I have to admit....I find it kind of funny.
After all, these folks (most of whom live in California) are going to be paying at LEAST 2% MORE in their state income tax....because of their "win".
AND, they'll be paying MORE in other taxes in order to cover more public schooling.....because of their "win".
I have to wonder whether they'll be laughing while they collect unemployment....
Hirota: scratching my head....
Help me out, here.....
On one hand, we have Susan Rice. Liberals everywhere are stating, without hesitation, that ANY words spoken against her, in ANY form, about her disastrous handling of the Benghazi situation, are racist as well as sexist.
On the OTHER hand, we have Mia Love, about whom THOSE SAME LIBERALS have remained silent when Love was called a "house nigger" and a "dirty, worthless whore".
Both are black.
Both are women.
Only ONE deemed worthy of defending: Rice.
Why?
Because she's a Liberal.
To Liberals, ideological purity is more important than race, color, gender, humanity.
Hirota: out.
On the OTHER hand, we have Mia Love, about whom THOSE SAME LIBERALS have remained silent when Love was called a "house nigger" and a "dirty, worthless whore".
Both are black.
Both are women.
Only ONE deemed worthy of defending: Rice.
Why?
Because she's a Liberal.
To Liberals, ideological purity is more important than race, color, gender, humanity.
Hirota: out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)