A question for Liberals....

If Planned Parenthood and Liberals, in general, REALLY care about women and "single mothers", why aren't they splitting the profits from the sale of unborn-childrens'-body-parts with them?

It occurs to me......

.....that Liberals who advocate the hunting-down and killing of the guy who killed that lion (I'll use its name just as soon as they start naming aborted fetuses...) and did so legally (still being investigated),  publishing his address and cell number, sending him death threats, etc.....

....should probably keep in mind that abortion is legal, too (though many of the circumstances of those acts are investigated as to their legality)...

In fact, Conservatives, as well, should keep this in mind.

Sorry, Cecil....

Although, personally, I'm not into trophy hunting, I also don't oppose or condemn anyone who is.

So, sorry, Cecil, but I'm busy being FAR more concerned about these other current issues:

- Planned Parenthood, the trafficking in human body parts, and abortion in general. (I'll make a deal with you Liberals: I'll start caring about Cecil when YOU start caring about the unborn, ok?)

- Iran...especially since it is now known that the US (read: Obama, Kerry) has caved on EVERY concession and especially since the IDIOT who negotiated this psychotically stupid deal is the SAME IDIOT who negotiated the North Korean deal under Clinton.....WHICH IS WHY NORTH KOREA HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

- Illegal immigration, since Obama is now granting amnesty to pretty much everyone...which is why incidences of terrorism, rape, murder, etc, is on the rise in the US.

- The Second Amendment, since, like Statists before them, Democrats want to remove the citizenry's ability to defend itself against....well....Democrats.

- Religious freedom, since, like Statists before them, Democrats recognize that the ONLY way to achieve their goal, the notion of "God" and "Family" MUST be destroyed.

So, sorry, Cecil....

And, sorry, Liberals.

But, ya know, it IS kind of inspiring.....

Perhaps, what we need is some good 'ol judicial activism, mixed with a dash of mob mentality:

First, since get some activist judges to declare, federally, that ALL American endangered species are fair game. We can call it: trophy hunting on demand! AWESOME!

Then, when anyone tries to STOP a trophy hunter from exercising their newly-found Constitutional right, let's make death threats, publish their phone numbers and addresses, and flood Facebook with stupid opinions!

AWESOME!  Let's treat animals EXACTLY like we treat the unborn!

Ponderable........

Now that Planned Parenthood has had their panties exposed, kinda begs the question.....

WHAT ELSE ARE THEY DOING, THAT HASN'T YET BEEN REVEALED??

And, for that matter, what is being hidden in OTHER Liberal-controlled things....

...like Public Schools, environmental movement, etc?

My guess?  Marxists do what Marxists do: whatever they want, in order to create fundamental inequality among humans....

.....and their idiot followers, like so many cows, just keep mindlessly chewing their cud, awaiting the slaughterhouse.....

Lessons, thanks to "The Donald"

The Donald is, currently, double digits ahead of all his competitors for the GOP nomination. How long this will last is anyone's guess; the likelihood of ANYONE surviving the process from now 'til November 2016 is pretty much ZERO.

But, he's all the rage....RIGHT NOW.

And, the REASON he's all the rage is where some lessons can be found.

FIRST:
It's been my opinion that a REAL, outspoken Conservative can slam-dunk an election. Look at Reagan's two runs...sure, he whacked Carter the first time (Carter was his biggest help...), but in his second run......already confirmed as a strong Conservative....Reagan took 49 states.

FORTY NINE STATES!!!  AS A PROVEN, STRONGGGGGGG CONSERVATIVE!!!

Yet, for SOME reason, Liberals in the political world and in the media keep telling us that "ONLY a 'moderate' Republican has a chance to win".
Well....that seemed to work out well for Romney and McCain....
Now, I'm NOT saying that Trump is a Conservative; he isn't. BUT, he HAS made some VERY Conservative statements, centering around a "TAKE BACK AMERICA" platform.

You can see the results.

SECOND:
Clearly, voters are tiring of rhetoric and parsed language. Those candidates who say it clearly will have an edge over those who do not. Period.
(This goes for both sides...)

THIRD:
It's ALSO been my long-standing opinion that there exists a "fifth column" in the GOP; Democrats.....Marxists, in practice and ideology....who have been planted as "sleepers" within the ranks of the GOP establishment. These "fifth columnists", at every critical opportunity, side with the Democrats.
These "fifth columnists", currently, are leading the effort, from within, to destroy Trump, along with Cruz and Walker. In a more broad sense, this "Fifth Column" is working to minimize the Conservative movement within the Republican Party (this includes "The Tea Party").

For further, historical, reading, go here: http://www.britannica.com/topic/fifth-column

As I said, The Donald will NOT likely survive to be the nominee for the Republican Party.

The candidate who WILL win is the candidate who can demonstrate strong, consistent Conservatism, who speaks plainly (you'll know this by how the media portrays him/her.....they'll be a "simpleton", "uneducated", "Bubba", "not nuanced"...), who's resume includes "...been a Governor...", who is able to prove that they actually CAN work with both sides and, perhaps MOST importantly, who's campaign is....

TAKE BACK AMERICA!

Thought for the day....

Liberals should keep in mind that The First Amendment, along with all the others, is protected by The Second....

...which, of course, is why they want to abolish The Second.

They won't.

You see, The Second ALSO protects itself....

This is an example of how Liberalism (Marxism) works

Remember when I said this:

Liberals believe:
- A person is free to make any choice, irrespective of whether that choice violates the rights of others.
- A person may make any choice, free of personal responsibility and personal consequence.
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-reminder-conservatism-101.html

The SCOTUS ruling about "gay marriage" fulfills both traits of Liberalism:

1. With the "legalization" of "gay marriage", homosexuals relieve themselves of the responsibilities and consequences of their choice. Those responsibilities and consequences will now be shouldered by society.

2. Already, the war on The First Amendment has begun it's new phase:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/06/29/it-begins-new-calls-to-strip-churches-of-tax-exempt-status-after-samesex-marriage-ruling-n2018688
With this ruling, Liberals are now free to make any choice, irrespective of whether the rights of others are violated.

When the newly formed United States broke from the king, it took 3% of the population to take up arms and fight the war of that revolution.

Who are those "3%" today?

The Supremes' supreme ignorance of....science

Yep, science.

Not unlike in '73, when the Supremes completely ignored the human rights issue in the abortion debate, the "gay marriage" decision also blatantly ignores science.

(Personally, I find it curious that Liberals....ever accusing the Right of being in "science denial", deny science on issues like homosexuality, reproductive genetics and historical global climate patterns.)

I digress....

With the blogosphere alight with "gay pride", one thing is PAINFULLY clear: most of the folks, on both sides of the issue, haven't a CLUE as to the nature of the debate. So, here we go:

1. The Human Genome Project was concluded in 2006, having mapped the entirety of the human genome. Before, during and since, Liberals have hoping to find "the gay gene". To date, no such gene has been found. The body of science is, ultimately, inconclusive. However, SOME science DOES seem to indicate a "genetic predisposition" to homosexuality, though this, too, remains inconclusive.
Therefore, based on current, relevant science, homosexuality remains a behavioral choice.

A behavioral choice, folks.

2. Throughout the history of our culture, "marriage" has been specifically defined and, although there have been those who have worked feverishly to redefine it, marriage remains unchanged in its definition. No Supreme Court decision will change that (just like no Supreme Court decision will redefine "homosexual". It's a definitional thing).

3. The Supremes' decision to legalize "gay marriage" in all states accomplishes two primary things:
First, relieves "gays" of the consequences of their behavioral choice and forces society to assume those consequences. Second, it violates states' rights sovereignty and makes "gay marriage" a federal issue (they did the same in Roe).

4. Although there is language....sort of....making allowances for "religious freedoms", in actual practice, the First Amendment's religious freedoms have been rendered meaningless. THAT battle is one we will see IMMEDIATELY and continually from this point forward.

So, in one decision, the Supremes have alleviated personal responsibility, taken on the role of Meriam-Webster, relegated states' rights to the trash heap and rendered the First Amendment meaningless.

But, there are FAR deeper issues here, folks.

Consider:

In 2011 (and far earlier than that, in other blogs and letters-to-the-editor), I've warned of the consequences associated with the legalization of "gay marriage":

http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-did-you-expect.html

And repeated that warning many times since:

http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/search?q=bestial

This IS the "slippery slope", folks. First "gay marriage", then multiple, incestuous, bestial, etc...

It is only a matter of time.

Check these out:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/

http://www.virped.org/

http://www.salon.com/2012/07/01/meet_pedophiles_who_mean_well/

https://knowitnextpsychicpredictions.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/movement-to-legalize-incestpedophilia/

ALL of this leads to the one thing essential to a Marxist state: the destruction of the family.

It is ABSOLUTELY clear, throughout history, that the destruction of the family, along with the destruction of the concept of God, the destruction of private property rights (hello "Kelo") and the confiscation of private firearms lead to one...ONLY...conclusion:

Communism.

This week, we witnessed two GIANT steps toward that end.

The only question that remains is this:

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Next stop.....

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Read this CAREFULLY, please. A lesson in Liberalism

I'm certainly NOT the first to point out the stories that Liberals make up in order to "prove a point"; Ann Coulter documents these things regularly.....and it happens, REGULARLY.

Between Lena Dunham's rape confabulation and Sarah Silverman's "wage gap" stupidity, Liberals...and, more importantly, CONSERVATIVES....will find important lessons.

For Liberals, the lesson can best be found in the wage gap lie, as explained by Sarah Silverman: (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416974/sarah-silverman-admits-she-made-wage-gap-story-then-calls-critics-maniacs-Katherine)

That Sarah has a tendency to say astonishingly stupid things is NOT news; this is SOP for her.

BUT, she does say something here that IS important.....

In her "apology", she states, "My regret is that I mentioned Al by name — it should have been a nameless, faceless anecdote and he has always been lovely to me."

So, first, she only apologizes for using Al's name. She DOESN'T apologize for making up a story.

BUT, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Sarah makes it clear that the NEXT time she makes up a story, she won't be using any names and, therefore, can't be called out as a liar. It'll be an anonymous name from an anonymous place, during an anonymous time.

For Conservatives, the lesson is this: if there is no name, no place or no time....it's a lie. It's made up. It NEVER HAPPENED. In fact, if you review ALL such cases, where a Liberal recounts a story of being wronged......you can rest comfortably in the knowledge that, in ALL likelihood, it's a lie. It never happened. It's made up.

Liberals: the best way to make sure that facts don't get in the way of your agenda is to NOT allow any facts into the narrative.

Conservatives: remember that old joke: how do you know when a Liberal is lying? Their lips are moving.