http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/27/Soldiers-On-The-Ground-Obama-s-Rules-Of-Engagement-Are-Costing-U-S-Lives-In-Afgahnistan
Step one: Elect a Socialist moron as President (win for the DNC!)
Step two: Have that moron dismantle the military, starting with the top brass, and replace those top brass slots with....Socialist morons with a rank. (win for the DNC!)
Step three: Have those Socialist morons with a rank change the rules of engagement; specifically to weaken our ability to defend soldiers in the field. (win for the DNC!)
Step four: kill LOTS of brave men and women. (GIGANTIC WIN for the DNC!!!!!!)
See?
It's a win, win, win, WIN for the Democratic Party.
Hirota: out.
Showing posts with label Liberals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberals. Show all posts
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
It's called "probing"....
No, this isn't a piece about new Liberal IRS methods...
A news piece came out today (which you are unlikely to hear about in the mainstream media, because it happened on Obama's watch...): A Portland, Oregon flight was diverted and performed a "level 2" emergency landing because of three men who were acting strangely on the flight. I'm sure it will come as a surprise to you that the three men were of Middle Eastern descent.
Evidently, the three men were fighting with flight crews, laying down in flight attendant's areas, complaining of illness, continually pacing up and down aisles and passing notes amongst themselves.
Of course, IF you DO hear about it (from a source other than Fox News), it will be written off by the administration as paranoia, a false alarm, or discrimination against "peaceful Muslims".
Aside from the stupidity of our President, this is nothing of the sort.
In war, they call it "probing". The enemy is looking for weaknesses which they can then exploit. And, make NO mistake: they WILL.
IF, by chance, this ISN'T probing, then it's another military term: diversionary tactic. Get your enemy to look the other way and concentrate his forces in another direction.
The problem here, folks, is simple: These radical Muslims are VERY smart; they understand war stategy and tactics.
Our President, on the other hand, is a blithering idiot, whose only ability to make war has been against the unborn.
Hirota: out.
A news piece came out today (which you are unlikely to hear about in the mainstream media, because it happened on Obama's watch...): A Portland, Oregon flight was diverted and performed a "level 2" emergency landing because of three men who were acting strangely on the flight. I'm sure it will come as a surprise to you that the three men were of Middle Eastern descent.
Evidently, the three men were fighting with flight crews, laying down in flight attendant's areas, complaining of illness, continually pacing up and down aisles and passing notes amongst themselves.
Of course, IF you DO hear about it (from a source other than Fox News), it will be written off by the administration as paranoia, a false alarm, or discrimination against "peaceful Muslims".
Aside from the stupidity of our President, this is nothing of the sort.
In war, they call it "probing". The enemy is looking for weaknesses which they can then exploit. And, make NO mistake: they WILL.
IF, by chance, this ISN'T probing, then it's another military term: diversionary tactic. Get your enemy to look the other way and concentrate his forces in another direction.
The problem here, folks, is simple: These radical Muslims are VERY smart; they understand war stategy and tactics.
Our President, on the other hand, is a blithering idiot, whose only ability to make war has been against the unborn.
Hirota: out.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Liberalism shows it's true face....again
Because, evidently, voters STILL just don't get it, Liberals remind us, through their actions, WHY we should take more time to understand....TRULY UNDERSTAND....issues and candidates BEFORE we vote on them.
On display, right now in Wisconsin, is Liberalism in it's truest form. Now that Governor Walker and Republicans have found a way to vote on the Public Union collective bargaining issue, while Democrats continue to hide under rocks, Liberals are acting out like the petulent children they are.
Republicans are now receiving death threats and Public Unions are now threatening businesses with boycotts is those businesses do not join them in protesting against Governor Walker.
Remember, folks, that this is the Party that claims to be "for the people", "the party of peace", "the party of fairness", "the party of individual rights", "the party of choice".
In truth, they are NONE OF THE ABOVE. Rather, they are the party "you'll do it my way or you're dead".
Hirota: out.
On display, right now in Wisconsin, is Liberalism in it's truest form. Now that Governor Walker and Republicans have found a way to vote on the Public Union collective bargaining issue, while Democrats continue to hide under rocks, Liberals are acting out like the petulent children they are.
Republicans are now receiving death threats and Public Unions are now threatening businesses with boycotts is those businesses do not join them in protesting against Governor Walker.
Remember, folks, that this is the Party that claims to be "for the people", "the party of peace", "the party of fairness", "the party of individual rights", "the party of choice".
In truth, they are NONE OF THE ABOVE. Rather, they are the party "you'll do it my way or you're dead".
Hirota: out.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Ahhh....those tolerant Liberals....
San Francisco, Liberal Mecca, is taking a case to the Supreme Court. It seems that the city has OFFICIALLY condemned the Catholic Church (specifically, the teachings of the Catholic Church), proclaiming the Church's teachings "discriminatory, insulting, callous and defamatory". It went on to say that Catholic teachings are, "...an insult to all San Franciscans" and accused the Vatican of being a "foreign country" that "meddles with and attempts to negatively influence this great city's existing and established customs and traditions."
A couple comments about this piece of news:
- It's no surprise that Liberals would ignore the First Amendment (you know, that nasty little Establishment clause) in order to forward their agenda.
- It's also no real surprise that Liberals are going after the Catholic Church, which seems to be their favorite target because the Church teaches stupid things like faith, morality, sacrifice, giving of and from self and devotion to Jesus Christ; NONE of which are considered by Liberals to be worthwhile attributes.
- The agenda is glaringly clear: if you want to kill Christianity, start with the head: Catholicism (which, much to the consternation of Liberals, has remained ultimately unmoved by them). You see, folks, it has nothing to do "religion" itself, but rather the destruction of ANYTHING which places values higher than government. Proof? Consider that San Francisco didn't condemn Islam, which ALSO should be viewed as an insult to San Francisco, since it relegates women to "property" and condemns to death homosexuals.
- So, why no condemnation of Muslims? That, too, is pretty easy to figure out. You see, radical Islam is currently the "great white hope" of Liberals to destroy America; it's freedoms and liberties. In this respect, Islam is worth defending and protecting by Liberals.
- Truth be known (and maybe Catholics ought to learn a lesson from this....NOT), if "radical Catholicism" became a reality, and set its sights on America in order to destroy our freedoms, liberites, wealth and way of life, Liberals would spare no effort or expense in its protection.
Ahhhh...those tolerant Liberals....
Hirota: out!
A couple comments about this piece of news:
- It's no surprise that Liberals would ignore the First Amendment (you know, that nasty little Establishment clause) in order to forward their agenda.
- It's also no real surprise that Liberals are going after the Catholic Church, which seems to be their favorite target because the Church teaches stupid things like faith, morality, sacrifice, giving of and from self and devotion to Jesus Christ; NONE of which are considered by Liberals to be worthwhile attributes.
- The agenda is glaringly clear: if you want to kill Christianity, start with the head: Catholicism (which, much to the consternation of Liberals, has remained ultimately unmoved by them). You see, folks, it has nothing to do "religion" itself, but rather the destruction of ANYTHING which places values higher than government. Proof? Consider that San Francisco didn't condemn Islam, which ALSO should be viewed as an insult to San Francisco, since it relegates women to "property" and condemns to death homosexuals.
- So, why no condemnation of Muslims? That, too, is pretty easy to figure out. You see, radical Islam is currently the "great white hope" of Liberals to destroy America; it's freedoms and liberties. In this respect, Islam is worth defending and protecting by Liberals.
- Truth be known (and maybe Catholics ought to learn a lesson from this....NOT), if "radical Catholicism" became a reality, and set its sights on America in order to destroy our freedoms, liberites, wealth and way of life, Liberals would spare no effort or expense in its protection.
Ahhhh...those tolerant Liberals....
Hirota: out!
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
FOLLOWUP: WMD's, etc...
From time to time, it's important to revisit past conversations. In this case, I'd like to bring up-to-date a couple items with respect to two of the favorite Liberal arguments against President Bush's decision to conduct the war in Iraq.
The two arguments:
1. "Bush lied (about WMD in Iraq), people died"
2. "Al Qaeda was never in Iraq"
Well, to the first point:
In spite of a growing number of official reports proving otherwise, Liberals continue to accuse President Bush of lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Unfortunately for Liberals, the latest Wikileaks dump released a surfeit of documents, supporting evidence of WMD in Iraq.
Consider:
http://213.251.145.96/id/0C267B58-BECA-3212-8DCAAC433BA88FDC/
http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=wmd&sort=date&category=Cache%20Found/Cleared
http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=biological
Also, hunting through my old personal files, looking for WMD-related stuff as well as other topics related to the Iraq war, I found:
A report, citing official findings of the Kay report:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/957186/posts
A report, citing "DebkaFile", on the movement of WMD to Syria. (I've read this agency for lots of years, and they are USUALLY pretty good, accuracy-wise. HOWEVER, I always look for other sources, as I don't trust this, or any other for that matter, one completely):
http://www.unfitnews.com/articles/DebkaFile.2004-02-02.DrKayHadMapsWithCoordinatesOfWMDHidingPlacesInSyria.htm
DOD report, on movement of WMD to Syria:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1671897/posts
DOD report on finding WMD in Iraq:
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918
With regard to the second item:
Weekly Standard released a piece about Iraq's association with Al Qaeda:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp
Will these pieces settle the questions? Of course not! Liberals simply believe what they believe and facts are of no significance....
Hirota: OUT!
The two arguments:
1. "Bush lied (about WMD in Iraq), people died"
2. "Al Qaeda was never in Iraq"
Well, to the first point:
In spite of a growing number of official reports proving otherwise, Liberals continue to accuse President Bush of lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Unfortunately for Liberals, the latest Wikileaks dump released a surfeit of documents, supporting evidence of WMD in Iraq.
Consider:
http://213.251.145.96/id/0C267B58-BECA-3212-8DCAAC433BA88FDC/
http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=wmd&sort=date&category=Cache%20Found/Cleared
http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=biological
Also, hunting through my old personal files, looking for WMD-related stuff as well as other topics related to the Iraq war, I found:
A report, citing official findings of the Kay report:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/957186/posts
A report, citing "DebkaFile", on the movement of WMD to Syria. (I've read this agency for lots of years, and they are USUALLY pretty good, accuracy-wise. HOWEVER, I always look for other sources, as I don't trust this, or any other for that matter, one completely):
http://www.unfitnews.com/articles/DebkaFile.2004-02-02.DrKayHadMapsWithCoordinatesOfWMDHidingPlacesInSyria.htm
DOD report, on movement of WMD to Syria:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1671897/posts
DOD report on finding WMD in Iraq:
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918
With regard to the second item:
Weekly Standard released a piece about Iraq's association with Al Qaeda:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp
Will these pieces settle the questions? Of course not! Liberals simply believe what they believe and facts are of no significance....
Hirota: OUT!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)