FOLLOWUP: WMD's, etc...

From time to time, it's important to revisit past conversations. In this case, I'd like to bring up-to-date a couple items with respect to two of the favorite Liberal arguments against President Bush's decision to conduct the war in Iraq.

The two arguments:

1. "Bush lied (about WMD in Iraq), people died"
2. "Al Qaeda was never in Iraq"

Well, to the first point:

In spite of a growing number of official reports proving otherwise, Liberals continue to accuse President Bush of lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Unfortunately for Liberals, the latest Wikileaks dump released a surfeit of documents, supporting evidence of WMD in Iraq.

Consider:

http://213.251.145.96/id/0C267B58-BECA-3212-8DCAAC433BA88FDC/

http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=wmd&sort=date&category=Cache%20Found/Cleared

http://213.251.145.96/search/?q=biological

Also, hunting through my old personal files, looking for WMD-related stuff as well as other topics related to the Iraq war, I found:

A report, citing official findings of the Kay report:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/957186/posts

A report, citing "DebkaFile", on the movement of WMD to Syria. (I've read this agency for lots of years, and they are USUALLY pretty good, accuracy-wise. HOWEVER, I always look for other sources, as I don't trust this, or any other for that matter, one completely):

http://www.unfitnews.com/articles/DebkaFile.2004-02-02.DrKayHadMapsWithCoordinatesOfWMDHidingPlacesInSyria.htm

DOD report, on movement of WMD to Syria:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1671897/posts

DOD report on finding WMD in Iraq:

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

With regard to the second item:

Weekly Standard released a piece about Iraq's association with Al Qaeda:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp

Will these pieces settle the questions? Of course not! Liberals simply believe what they believe and facts are of no significance....

Hirota: OUT!