A lesson to voters in 2012

Two of Obama's largest voting blocks in 2008 were blacks and the youth

In just three years, these groups have taken a huge drubbing from the person THEY put in office.

Consider:

- By race, the highest unemployment in the US is within the black community. In addition, blacks have have disproportionately foreclosed-on in the collapse of the housing market.

- By age group, the highest rate of unemployment in the US is the youth;

specifically between the ages of 16 and 29. Unemployment for this group is a staggering 45%.

These groups, like so many others, never bothered to look into Obama, the man. The only watched TV, and just assumed that everything being said by the mainsteam media was gospel truth.

And, even when damning evidence DID come out about their lord and savior, they simply chose to ignore it.

Now, of course, they are paying the price.

Unfortunately, though, I don't see these groups learning anything soon.....

Although the "youth vote" is beginning to come around to rational thought, the "black vote" is still hopelessly, deliberately, ignorant, as polls show that support for Obama among blacks remains high.

In spite of the promises, irrespective of the truth, Obama has run this country into the ground. The rich are richer because of his policies, the poor are poorer (and there are more of them, too).

As the philosopher once said, "those who forget history are doomed to repeat it".

And, evidently, we've lost our ability to survive....

Hirota: out.

Descent into Hell

Whether or not you are the type of person who makes New Years resolutions, please take some time on New Years eve to make one.....this one:

Pray for the people of Iraq.

Because of Obama (and the entire Democratic Party), Iraq, even as withdrawal our troops, is descending into hell.

This week alone, some 50 or so Iraqis were butchered by terrorists. And the numbers....without question....will continue to rise.

Sunni Al Qaeda has begun the bloddy process of taking over the country and will begin by severely punishing its people. They plan to show, through any and all violent means necessary, that they are in charge.

We are about to witness the beginning of an ethnic cleansing, about which our President will do nothing (taking his cue from Bill Clinton, who ignored the butchering of nearly one million Tutsis at the hands of Muslim Hutus in Rwanda).

Aren't we the people who said, "NEVER AGAIN!"?

Well, it's happening again: what are we going to do about it?

Hirota: out.

Thank you, Mr. President!

Dear President Obama,
Because of you, I'm now part of the fabric that is "The Urban Dictionary"!
My friends and family, along with the rest of the world, will finally understand WHY you do the things you do.....

Folks,
The Urban Dictionary will now include my own definition (which pretty much applies to ALL Liberals...):

Premature iraqulation

Definition: The inability to remain at a task because of fear of failing, even though you are currently succeeding.

Example: The football team was 42 points up, with 2 minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, when their head coach forfeited the game. The coach suffers from premature Iraqulation.

How is this possible??

It was reported today that a series of bombings has taken place in Baghdad; killing at least 69 people.

I thought our mission was completed in Iraq? I thought Obama was pulling troops OUT of Iraq?

I thought our presence was no longer needed in Iraq?

Shouldn't al Qaeda be happy, now that we are leaving?

I guess not...

How the Liberals have handled Iraq can best be described as being in a football game. Our team, through the first three quarters, leads by 100 touchdowns.

Then, the head coach of our team says: "WE CAN'T POSSIBLY WIN THIS......WE FORFEIT!"

I'm not sure whether Liberals are afraid of winning or if they are just so used to losing....

Either way, Iraq will now devolve; slide into chaos. Al Qaeda will take over, establishing a hostile terrorist state who's main enemy will be the United States.

And, by the way, with our withdrawal, Obama has rendered the sacrifice of our men and women who've paid the ultimate price for our freedom...meaningless (and thus has fulfilled the wishes, dreams and fantasies of all Liberals...)

Hirota: out

Picture of the day

Since Obama is a gutless, spineless coward, when he says, "I've got a bone to pick...", this is what he means:

Clown rumble

Today, Hugo "Bozo" Chavez referred to our President, Barack "Bim Bom" Obama as "a clown".

Chavez' statement comes on the heals of a comment made by "Bim Bom" earlier this week:

"We’re concerned about the government’s actions, which have restricted the universal rights of the Venezuelan people, threatened basic democratic values, and failed to contribute to the security in the region. Moreover, it’s unfortunate that the Venezuelan government is often more interested in revisiting the ideological battles of the past than looking forward to the future that we could build for our citizens.”

Hmmmm.....let's see....what was it that that "Jesus" guy said? Something about taking the plank out of your own eye before you attempt to remove the sliver from another's?

So, in a million words (TelePrompTer'd, no doubt), Barack perfectly characterizes not only Chavez, but himself as well.

And, in one word, Chavez does the same.....

HONK HONK......BOINGGGGGG......FWEEEET.....

The battle of the clowns rages on....

Hirota: out.

The good news and the bad news....

The Good News?

Kim Jong Il...butcher, tyrant, psychopath, sociopath, Liberal....is dead.

The Bad News? Twofold:

His idiot son is the heir to power, and...

...with Obama in charge (of Hillary), they'll be strapping on the kneepads and vasoline-ing their lips....LET THE APPEASEMENT BEGIN!

(Hillary's husband, if you recall, is the idiot who gave North Korea it's nuclear weapons program)

What's left to hand over? What'll Hill-bama give them? A missile defense system, perhaps?

Hirota: out.

Psycho Nancy....

The only human beings more out-of-touch than Nancy Pelosi are her constituents.

By way of ABSOLUTE, undeniable, unquestionable truth:

Pelosi, today, stated, as a matter of fact, that extending unemployment benefits will create 600,000 jobs!

No...really....she actually said this!

So, let's see.....if we (the taxpayers) pay you NOT to work, with money that comes from.....we, the taxpayers (who will now be FURTHER burdened with crippling taxes), 600 THOUSAND jobs will be created?

Perhaps I'm just not "nuanced" enough....but I don't get it.

The ONLY way that Pelosi's ridiculous claim can POSSIBLY ring true is if, through this legislation, 600,000 highly-skilled and moderately-paid workers get fired (because of the increases in their employers' tax rates) and are replaced by unskilled, far-lower-paid workers...

...after all, Pelosi DIDN'T mention how many jobs would be LOST through this legislation...

Ya know, this is beginning to smack of the Khmer Rouge's tactic of ridding society of the skilled and educated........

Of course, the method was quite a bit different, but the goals are the same: absolute control.

Hirota: out

Time Magazine's 'Person of the Year'

No real surprise here, folks. TIME Magazine's "Person of the Year" was awarded to 'The Protester'.

As in The Occupy movement, and various protests around the world.

So......I got to thinking........and then did some looking.....

"Person of the Year (formerly Man of the Year) is an annual issue of the United States news magazine that features and profiles a person, couple, group, idea, place, or machine that 'for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year.'"

Such is the criterion by which Time claims to qualify their selection.

Two words come to mind: "Bull" and "Sh**".

You might think that the "Person of the Year" for 2010 ought to have been a BLINDINGLY obvious choice, but alas...

...it was Mark Zuckerberg.

No doubt, Zuckerberg does fit the criterion.

But PLEASE don't tell me that he was MORE influential that year than "THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT"!

This is the group that inspired the nation to achieve the greatest turnover in American politics in history.

Yet, EVEN though TIME would consider this feat to represent the "for worse" part of their criterion, found fit leave them behind.

No great surprise.....

Hirota: out

Think about it, folks....

Dear GOP,

PLEASE consider nominating Rep. Kevin McCarthy for the Veep slot in 2012.

One of the "Young Guns" (along with Cantor and Ryan), McCarthy comes from California.

Now, while I don't see a circumstance that would gain the Republican vote in the election, the nomination of McCarthy WOULD have at least one PROFOUND affect:

IT WOULD FORCE THE DNC TO DO SOMETHING IT HASN'T HAD TO DO IN A LONGGGGGGGG TIME: SPEND MONEY IN CALIFORNIA.

In fact, they'd have to dump their WHOLE war chest in California.

The battle for President is largely a swing state matter; with those swing states receiving the lion's share of BOTH party's campaign money.

IF nominated, Democrats would have to spend HUGE amounts of money in California, which would completely defund the monies usually dedicated to swing states.

Obama is ALREADY having his ass handed to him in these states by both Romney and Gingrich.

A McCarthy nomination would almost SURELY end Democratic squatting in the Executive Office....

Hirota: out.

Holder: typical Liberal hypocrite

Holder, now officially in Clintonesque-sex-denial mode, is now championing the cause of the abolition of voter ID requirements.
Evidently, proving that you are LEGALLY eligible to vote is somehow an act of discrimination.

Holder stated that voter ID laws suppress the votes of minorities and that "we are a better nation when more people are involved in the process". Evidently, what Holder MEANS is that "illegals are allowed to vote...".

Now, truly, this is not just Holder talking. It's the entirety of the Democratic Party, who believe that convicted felons should be allowed to vote, children should be allowed to vote, etc.

So....if it IS about "Americans being involved in the process" and that "every vote should count" (irrespective of legality), then it begs the question:

WHY DON'T DEMOCRATS BELIEVE IN ELECTORAL REFORM IN CALIFORNIA, NEW YORK OR FLORIDA?

After all, those are ALL "winner-takes-all" states and, in fact, ANY state where this system of electoral votes exists, the minority party is COMPLETELY excluded in the electoral process.

IF these states split the electoral votes along actual popular vote lines, then each voice casting a vote WOULD "be included in the process. (IF this had been the case, say, in 2008 election, McCain would have received just under half of the states then-55 electoral votes, instead of Obama taking ALL 55). now, this wouldn't have won McCain the election, but it WOULD have been a truly fair representation of the vote.

Yet, Democrats express NO interest in this. In fact, they actively condemn efforts to reform the electoral system.

You see, the Democrats have NO interest in what is fair.

They care ONLY for whatever discrimination necessary to maintain their stranglehold on power...

Hirota: out.

Chaulk another one up for science!

So....scientists are reporting that they are tantalizingly close to seeing the "god particle".

Together, everyone: "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO......AHHHHHHHHHH"....

The "god particle"....as in "defining "God" as a scientifically-measurably event....

So cute: Liberals and scientists desperately trying to debunk God...

(Hint: scientists, you're likely to find that particle right between "the gay gene" and the "proof of Global Warming data", on the shelf marked "UFO's, unicorns and other fantasies"....THAT'S where it's hiding...)

Hirota: laughing.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz outdoes herself....

Chairthing of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, as astonishing as it may seem, has outdone herself!

Known, in her short tenure, for making preposterous pronouncements which consist variously of deliberate misdirection, lies of omission and outright confabulations, the Debster (CLEARLY off her medication again) has topped them all when, asked by an interviewer about the unemployment rate. Here's how the exchange went:

Gretchen Carlson, FOX News: Unemployment has gone up precipitously since he took office.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC Chair: That is simply not true. In fact, unemployment has now dropped below 9%. It’s continuing to drop. He’s been focused on —

Carlson: It’s higher than when they promised the stimulus would lower it to 8%.

Wasserman Schultz: You see, that narrative doesn’t work for you anymore, though, because —

Carlson: It’s not my narrative. I’m just talking about facts.

Wasserman Schultz: You just said the unemployment rate is going up since Obama took office, and it hasn’t.

Carlson: Is unemployment higher since President Obama took office?

Wasserman Schultz: What’s happened since President Obama took office —

Carlson: Is unemployment higher than when he took office?

Wasserman Schultz: Unemployment is nearing right around where it was when President Obama took office and it’s dropping. You just said it’s been increasing and that’s not true.

Now, aside from the moments of soft-shoe, Wasserman is CLEARLY suggesting that the unemployment rate has NOT increased under the Obama administration. AND, not-so-clearly, she's also (quite obviously) laying the blame at the feet of President Bush.

....what a shock.

Now, there's what Wasserman-Schultz said, and then there's the truth (and NEVER the twain shall meet).

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, here's the annual unemployment rates since 2001:

2001 4.7
2002 5.8
2003 6.0
2004 5.5
2005 5.1
2006 4.6
2007 4.6
2008 5.8
2009 9.3
2010 9.6

Grab a pen, Deb:

As you can clearly see, under the Bush administration (which began with 9/11), unemployment rates....EVEN WITH "TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH"...didn't top 6%. And, in fact, from 2003 through 2006, those rates gradually decreased.

In 2007, though maintaining a 4.6% unemployment rate annual average, began to see a dramatic INCREASE in unemployment rates beginning toward the end of that year. Yes, Bush was still in office and THIS is the trend that Liberals like Wasserman love to point to with the "See? It's Bush's fault" carping. "Failed policies!" "Tax cuts for the rich!" "Bush hates black people!" (ooops....that was Kanye...)

In fact, there was a VERY important factor....COMPLETELY ignored by Liberals (like The Debster)...that caused the rise in unemployment in 2007 and began the slide which Obama has exacerbated:

THE 2006 MID-TERM ELECTIONS.

More specifically, it was Nancy "I-plan-to-have-facelifts-until-my-ears-meet" Pelosi's campaign promise to increase the minimum wage that began the collapse of employment in America. Interestingly, if you do your homework, you'll see that the unemployment rate began to rise within a couple months of the minimum wage increase took effect!

...How about that!?

What amazes me is that Wasserman seems PROUD of the fact that Obama's unemployment rate "is about the same as when he took office": WELL over 8% (which is STILL 2 points higher than Bush's WORST year).

Are some Americans REALLY so stupid as to believe idiots like Wasserman-Schultz?

Evidently so......

Perhaps she should given the title of "Minister of Information" and change her last name to Wasserman-Schultz-al-Sahaf...

Hirota: out.