Holder: typical Liberal hypocrite

Holder, now officially in Clintonesque-sex-denial mode, is now championing the cause of the abolition of voter ID requirements.
Evidently, proving that you are LEGALLY eligible to vote is somehow an act of discrimination.

Holder stated that voter ID laws suppress the votes of minorities and that "we are a better nation when more people are involved in the process". Evidently, what Holder MEANS is that "illegals are allowed to vote...".

Now, truly, this is not just Holder talking. It's the entirety of the Democratic Party, who believe that convicted felons should be allowed to vote, children should be allowed to vote, etc.

So....if it IS about "Americans being involved in the process" and that "every vote should count" (irrespective of legality), then it begs the question:

WHY DON'T DEMOCRATS BELIEVE IN ELECTORAL REFORM IN CALIFORNIA, NEW YORK OR FLORIDA?

After all, those are ALL "winner-takes-all" states and, in fact, ANY state where this system of electoral votes exists, the minority party is COMPLETELY excluded in the electoral process.

IF these states split the electoral votes along actual popular vote lines, then each voice casting a vote WOULD "be included in the process. (IF this had been the case, say, in 2008 election, McCain would have received just under half of the states then-55 electoral votes, instead of Obama taking ALL 55). now, this wouldn't have won McCain the election, but it WOULD have been a truly fair representation of the vote.

Yet, Democrats express NO interest in this. In fact, they actively condemn efforts to reform the electoral system.

You see, the Democrats have NO interest in what is fair.

They care ONLY for whatever discrimination necessary to maintain their stranglehold on power...

Hirota: out.