http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/25/Brewer-Likely-to-Veto-Bill-Protecting-Religious-Freedom
The first kind of coward, the collection of business owners fearing a state boycott and, in doing so, have decided that money is more important than the First Amendment (specifically, religious freedom).
The second....possible (cuz the decision hasn't been made yet)...coward is Jan Brewer who, IF she vetoes the Bill, ALSO chooses money over religious freedom.
Let's be clear about a couple things, folks:
- This ISN'T a civil rights issue, unless there will ALSO be a ban on "no shirt, no shoes, no service" and "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" signs. This law, if vetoed, will simply mean that if you are a business owner, it will be illegal for you to refuse service to ANYONE, for ANY REASON. (It'll be fun to watch a 600lb morbidly obese man, wearing only a thong with a 'sexual device' strapped to it, walk into a "Chuck-e-cheez" and get in line to place an order......)
- This is NOT a human rights issue, since, to date, there is no conclusive evidence that homosexuality has genetic origin. (Might that change? Of course. However.....). Homosexuality, currently, is a behavioral choice.
Folks, this is an easy one to understand, given the facts.
This is a question of "which is more important: money or religious freedom as defined by The First Amendment?".
Or, if you'd rather: "which is more important: money or principle?"
Hirota: out.
BTW.....to the cowardly business owners in AZ:
What you SHOULD be worried about is the boycott (by Conservatives, Religious, etc) that might happen if you kill this Bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment