Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Clarity

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/06/Same-Sex-Marriage-SCOTUS

Funny how this is being interpreted......by "gays".....

This, they view as a win. And, I suppose, it is, in a way. If SCOTUS doesn't hear these cases, then the court tosses the issue back to the states.

And they are right (the Court, that is).

"Gay marriage" ISN'T a Constitutional issue.

"Gay marriage" is a DEFINITIONAL issue.

Just as DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) was struck down, "gay marriage" also has NO business being debated from a Constitutional standpoint, other than whether it IS or ISN'T a matter of Constitution.

Why?

Simple: "gay" (homosexual, properly) ISN'T a genetic disposition. NO science has concluded that homosexuality is genetic.

In fact, the closest to a genetic issue that homosexuality has is "predisposition".

As in, there MAY BE genes which, if expressed, might predispose a person to be homosexual.

This position, however, is highly speculative and ultimately inconclusive as well.

What HASN'T been demonstrated (to date) is the presence of a "gay gene".

Therefore, based on that inconclusive science, the BEST evidence points to a POSSIBLE genetic predisposition. ONLY.

Put in context, this is the same realm as drug addiction (also a probable genetic predisposition).

So, in ACTUAL reality, and based on ALL current, REAL, evidence, homosexuality is a behavioral choice.

A BEHAVIORAL CHOICE. period.

THIS is why the SCOTUS won't hear these cases. And they are right.

Homosexuals love to portray themselves as the new "black" or "woman", from a rights perspective.

This is a lie. Or, at best, a misunderstanding of the actual facts.

So, what the SCOTUS ACTUALLY said was EXACTLY this:

"Gay marriage" has nothing to do with the Constitution.

Same goes for ANY marriage issue.

"Gay marriage" is a definitional problem, since marriage is VERY specifically defined throughout history. And, although there have been cultures and people who have attempted to change that definition, marriage remains marriage; a legal union binding one man to one woman.

No amount of legislation or activism will EVER change this.

Ever.

No comments: