HOW they lie to you, part 2

I recently saw a meme on FB, with Hillary supposedly making this statement: "I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise children. Parents have a secondary role."

So, taking a look around, I happened on two web pages.

The first, the ever-trustworthy SNOPES, said (probably correctly) that this was rated "false"; that Hillary had never said that in her book "It takes a village". Indeed, I don't recall reading that, either (though, in fairness, I was so mind-numbed reading that piece of garbage that I could very well have missed it).

But, what SNOPES failed to mention (which I believe is VERY appropriate to the subject, and the second piece I found) was that Hillary wrote a series of intellectual essays on children's issuesin the ‘70’s, and in 1977, was hired by the Carnegie Council on Children, as a research assistant (to respond to sociologist Uri Bronfenbrenner's assertion that child rearing in the Soviet Union was superior to that of the United States).

As characterized by Joyce Milton, author of "The First Partner", who considers the panel report "must reading for anyone who seeks to understand Hillary Rodham's vision for the future of American families"...the panel started out with the assumption that the “triumph of the ‘universal entitlement state’ was inevitable, and the best thing Americans could do for their children was to hasten its arrival.” She went on to state that the report offered “a blueprint for undermining the authority of parents whose values the authors considered outmoded.”

In the chapter that Hillary Rodham worked on, titled “Protection of Children’s Rights”, she states “it has become necessary for society to make some piecemeal accommodations to prevent parents from denying children certain privileges that society wants them to have”. Included in these “privileges” are allowing children to consult doctors for pregnancy and drug-related issues without parental consent, preventing schools from expelling or suspending disruptive students and, remarkably, the adoption of a “public advocate” (people who can speak to children’s issues, against their parents’ wishes).

The report goes on to say that “In a simpler world, parents were the only advocates for children. This is no longer true. In a complex society where invisible decision makers affect children’s lives profoundly, both children and parents need canny advocates. What if all parents made relatively small financial contributions to such a cause? It would provide a politically insulated fund for lawyers, ombudsmen, agency monitors, and even attempts at legislative reform.”

So, did Hillary actually say the words in that meme? Probably not.

BUT, without question, those ARE, in fact, her sentiments.

And, not just hers. The Democrat Party, on whole, advocates for this Soviet-styled child rearing (remember Barbara Boxer’s advocacy for the UN’s “Children’s Bill of Rights”?

This sentiment strongly supports my personal belief that Democrats, in order to establish a Socialist America, must destroy the notion and sanctity of family. Abortion, “gay” marriage, Welfare, anti-Christianity, etc…..ALL are pillars supporting the building of a Socialist nation.

When you vote for Democrats, you vote FOR the destruction of family.