A question for Liberals....

If Planned Parenthood and Liberals, in general, REALLY care about women and "single mothers", why aren't they splitting the profits from the sale of unborn-childrens'-body-parts with them?

It occurs to me......

.....that Liberals who advocate the hunting-down and killing of the guy who killed that lion (I'll use its name just as soon as they start naming aborted fetuses...) and did so legally (still being investigated),  publishing his address and cell number, sending him death threats, etc.....

....should probably keep in mind that abortion is legal, too (though many of the circumstances of those acts are investigated as to their legality)...

In fact, Conservatives, as well, should keep this in mind.

Sorry, Cecil....

Although, personally, I'm not into trophy hunting, I also don't oppose or condemn anyone who is.

So, sorry, Cecil, but I'm busy being FAR more concerned about these other current issues:

- Planned Parenthood, the trafficking in human body parts, and abortion in general. (I'll make a deal with you Liberals: I'll start caring about Cecil when YOU start caring about the unborn, ok?)

- Iran...especially since it is now known that the US (read: Obama, Kerry) has caved on EVERY concession and especially since the IDIOT who negotiated this psychotically stupid deal is the SAME IDIOT who negotiated the North Korean deal under Clinton.....WHICH IS WHY NORTH KOREA HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

- Illegal immigration, since Obama is now granting amnesty to pretty much everyone...which is why incidences of terrorism, rape, murder, etc, is on the rise in the US.

- The Second Amendment, since, like Statists before them, Democrats want to remove the citizenry's ability to defend itself against....well....Democrats.

- Religious freedom, since, like Statists before them, Democrats recognize that the ONLY way to achieve their goal, the notion of "God" and "Family" MUST be destroyed.

So, sorry, Cecil....

And, sorry, Liberals.

But, ya know, it IS kind of inspiring.....

Perhaps, what we need is some good 'ol judicial activism, mixed with a dash of mob mentality:

First, since get some activist judges to declare, federally, that ALL American endangered species are fair game. We can call it: trophy hunting on demand! AWESOME!

Then, when anyone tries to STOP a trophy hunter from exercising their newly-found Constitutional right, let's make death threats, publish their phone numbers and addresses, and flood Facebook with stupid opinions!

AWESOME!  Let's treat animals EXACTLY like we treat the unborn!

Ponderable........

Now that Planned Parenthood has had their panties exposed, kinda begs the question.....

WHAT ELSE ARE THEY DOING, THAT HASN'T YET BEEN REVEALED??

And, for that matter, what is being hidden in OTHER Liberal-controlled things....

...like Public Schools, environmental movement, etc?

My guess?  Marxists do what Marxists do: whatever they want, in order to create fundamental inequality among humans....

.....and their idiot followers, like so many cows, just keep mindlessly chewing their cud, awaiting the slaughterhouse.....

Lessons, thanks to "The Donald"

The Donald is, currently, double digits ahead of all his competitors for the GOP nomination. How long this will last is anyone's guess; the likelihood of ANYONE surviving the process from now 'til November 2016 is pretty much ZERO.

But, he's all the rage....RIGHT NOW.

And, the REASON he's all the rage is where some lessons can be found.

FIRST:
It's been my opinion that a REAL, outspoken Conservative can slam-dunk an election. Look at Reagan's two runs...sure, he whacked Carter the first time (Carter was his biggest help...), but in his second run......already confirmed as a strong Conservative....Reagan took 49 states.

FORTY NINE STATES!!!  AS A PROVEN, STRONGGGGGGG CONSERVATIVE!!!

Yet, for SOME reason, Liberals in the political world and in the media keep telling us that "ONLY a 'moderate' Republican has a chance to win".
Well....that seemed to work out well for Romney and McCain....
Now, I'm NOT saying that Trump is a Conservative; he isn't. BUT, he HAS made some VERY Conservative statements, centering around a "TAKE BACK AMERICA" platform.

You can see the results.

SECOND:
Clearly, voters are tiring of rhetoric and parsed language. Those candidates who say it clearly will have an edge over those who do not. Period.
(This goes for both sides...)

THIRD:
It's ALSO been my long-standing opinion that there exists a "fifth column" in the GOP; Democrats.....Marxists, in practice and ideology....who have been planted as "sleepers" within the ranks of the GOP establishment. These "fifth columnists", at every critical opportunity, side with the Democrats.
These "fifth columnists", currently, are leading the effort, from within, to destroy Trump, along with Cruz and Walker. In a more broad sense, this "Fifth Column" is working to minimize the Conservative movement within the Republican Party (this includes "The Tea Party").

For further, historical, reading, go here: http://www.britannica.com/topic/fifth-column

As I said, The Donald will NOT likely survive to be the nominee for the Republican Party.

The candidate who WILL win is the candidate who can demonstrate strong, consistent Conservatism, who speaks plainly (you'll know this by how the media portrays him/her.....they'll be a "simpleton", "uneducated", "Bubba", "not nuanced"...), who's resume includes "...been a Governor...", who is able to prove that they actually CAN work with both sides and, perhaps MOST importantly, who's campaign is....

TAKE BACK AMERICA!

Thought for the day....

Liberals should keep in mind that The First Amendment, along with all the others, is protected by The Second....

...which, of course, is why they want to abolish The Second.

They won't.

You see, The Second ALSO protects itself....

This is an example of how Liberalism (Marxism) works

Remember when I said this:

Liberals believe:
- A person is free to make any choice, irrespective of whether that choice violates the rights of others.
- A person may make any choice, free of personal responsibility and personal consequence.
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-reminder-conservatism-101.html

The SCOTUS ruling about "gay marriage" fulfills both traits of Liberalism:

1. With the "legalization" of "gay marriage", homosexuals relieve themselves of the responsibilities and consequences of their choice. Those responsibilities and consequences will now be shouldered by society.

2. Already, the war on The First Amendment has begun it's new phase:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/06/29/it-begins-new-calls-to-strip-churches-of-tax-exempt-status-after-samesex-marriage-ruling-n2018688
With this ruling, Liberals are now free to make any choice, irrespective of whether the rights of others are violated.

When the newly formed United States broke from the king, it took 3% of the population to take up arms and fight the war of that revolution.

Who are those "3%" today?

The Supremes' supreme ignorance of....science

Yep, science.

Not unlike in '73, when the Supremes completely ignored the human rights issue in the abortion debate, the "gay marriage" decision also blatantly ignores science.

(Personally, I find it curious that Liberals....ever accusing the Right of being in "science denial", deny science on issues like homosexuality, reproductive genetics and historical global climate patterns.)

I digress....

With the blogosphere alight with "gay pride", one thing is PAINFULLY clear: most of the folks, on both sides of the issue, haven't a CLUE as to the nature of the debate. So, here we go:

1. The Human Genome Project was concluded in 2006, having mapped the entirety of the human genome. Before, during and since, Liberals have hoping to find "the gay gene". To date, no such gene has been found. The body of science is, ultimately, inconclusive. However, SOME science DOES seem to indicate a "genetic predisposition" to homosexuality, though this, too, remains inconclusive.
Therefore, based on current, relevant science, homosexuality remains a behavioral choice.

A behavioral choice, folks.

2. Throughout the history of our culture, "marriage" has been specifically defined and, although there have been those who have worked feverishly to redefine it, marriage remains unchanged in its definition. No Supreme Court decision will change that (just like no Supreme Court decision will redefine "homosexual". It's a definitional thing).

3. The Supremes' decision to legalize "gay marriage" in all states accomplishes two primary things:
First, relieves "gays" of the consequences of their behavioral choice and forces society to assume those consequences. Second, it violates states' rights sovereignty and makes "gay marriage" a federal issue (they did the same in Roe).

4. Although there is language....sort of....making allowances for "religious freedoms", in actual practice, the First Amendment's religious freedoms have been rendered meaningless. THAT battle is one we will see IMMEDIATELY and continually from this point forward.

So, in one decision, the Supremes have alleviated personal responsibility, taken on the role of Meriam-Webster, relegated states' rights to the trash heap and rendered the First Amendment meaningless.

But, there are FAR deeper issues here, folks.

Consider:

In 2011 (and far earlier than that, in other blogs and letters-to-the-editor), I've warned of the consequences associated with the legalization of "gay marriage":

http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-did-you-expect.html

And repeated that warning many times since:

http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/search?q=bestial

This IS the "slippery slope", folks. First "gay marriage", then multiple, incestuous, bestial, etc...

It is only a matter of time.

Check these out:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/

http://www.virped.org/

http://www.salon.com/2012/07/01/meet_pedophiles_who_mean_well/

https://knowitnextpsychicpredictions.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/movement-to-legalize-incestpedophilia/

ALL of this leads to the one thing essential to a Marxist state: the destruction of the family.

It is ABSOLUTELY clear, throughout history, that the destruction of the family, along with the destruction of the concept of God, the destruction of private property rights (hello "Kelo") and the confiscation of private firearms lead to one...ONLY...conclusion:

Communism.

This week, we witnessed two GIANT steps toward that end.

The only question that remains is this:

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Next stop.....

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Read this CAREFULLY, please. A lesson in Liberalism

I'm certainly NOT the first to point out the stories that Liberals make up in order to "prove a point"; Ann Coulter documents these things regularly.....and it happens, REGULARLY.

Between Lena Dunham's rape confabulation and Sarah Silverman's "wage gap" stupidity, Liberals...and, more importantly, CONSERVATIVES....will find important lessons.

For Liberals, the lesson can best be found in the wage gap lie, as explained by Sarah Silverman: (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416974/sarah-silverman-admits-she-made-wage-gap-story-then-calls-critics-maniacs-Katherine)

That Sarah has a tendency to say astonishingly stupid things is NOT news; this is SOP for her.

BUT, she does say something here that IS important.....

In her "apology", she states, "My regret is that I mentioned Al by name — it should have been a nameless, faceless anecdote and he has always been lovely to me."

So, first, she only apologizes for using Al's name. She DOESN'T apologize for making up a story.

BUT, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Sarah makes it clear that the NEXT time she makes up a story, she won't be using any names and, therefore, can't be called out as a liar. It'll be an anonymous name from an anonymous place, during an anonymous time.

For Conservatives, the lesson is this: if there is no name, no place or no time....it's a lie. It's made up. It NEVER HAPPENED. In fact, if you review ALL such cases, where a Liberal recounts a story of being wronged......you can rest comfortably in the knowledge that, in ALL likelihood, it's a lie. It never happened. It's made up.

Liberals: the best way to make sure that facts don't get in the way of your agenda is to NOT allow any facts into the narrative.

Conservatives: remember that old joke: how do you know when a Liberal is lying? Their lips are moving.

Doesn't make sense! Or does it?

Doesn't it seem rather bizarre that Obama, Hillary and all the Democrats support Islam (specifically: radical Islam, Muslim regimes)? After all, the "law" to which these groups claim to adhere, Shariah, seems in stark contrast to what Democrats claim to support: women's rights, homosexual rights, etc.

With Obama, specifically, this is often written off to "well, he's really a Muslim, so he supports Muslims, irrespective of their true nature". But this argument doesn't apply to the possibility that Obama is a Christian (which has also been claimed).

More odd is the fact that while they support Islam in it's most radical forms, Democrats condemn Christianity and Judaism.

So....this thing ISN'T about respect for the sanctity of religion and religious freedom.

There is a commonality with ALL Democrats (in power) and their bizarre support of Islam (radical).

That commonality?

MARXISM.

Radical Muslims, though they claim to be devoutly religious, are mere Marxists and, therefore, devoid of religious beliefs. (Sounds like Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy, doesn't it?)

But, it's Marxism that unites Democrats and Radical Muslims; and THIS is why they act in mutual support. And THIS is why they condemn Christianity and Judaism (Marxism requires that the only accepted 'religion' IS Marxism).

"But", you might say, "Democrats CAN'T be Marxists. Marxists, throughout history, have been quite unkind to women, blacks (and other races), homosexuals, etc. Yet, Democrats SUPPORT these groups!"

Sorry. Wrong. This, in fact, PROVES that Democrats are Marxists. How do Marxists operate? Let's use Marxists Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, believer in eugenics, hater of blacks). Sanger, in this quote, suggests using black ministers to draw support from other blacks, through religion, in order to force her agenda......to kill blacks:

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

Marxists and Marxists everywhere and everywhen. Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Syria.....all work to accomplish the same goals:

- Destroy the notion of "God"
- Destroy the notion of "family"
- Disarm the citizenry

In accomplishing these goals, they pave the way for population control. THEY will now decide who has the right to exist.

NOW does it make sense?

Haven't you figured it out yet?

Such a flap about Indiana's RFRA! Who cares that no other state, in passing similar laws, went pretty much unnoticed! Who cares that the FEDERAL law, signed by BILL CLINTON.....the "first black President"...went pretty much unnoticed!?

ITS A DIVERSION.

Let's see......what could the media (and the rest of the Democrats) be "DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN" -ing about?

- The continuing Benghazi investigation, which KEEPS turning up evidence, damaging to both Obama AND Hillary Clinton. 

- Hillary's personal server which has now been wiped clean. 

- The Iran "deal" which, so far, has been a complete capitulation by the US. 

- The new jobs numbers: 
    - Historic high number of Americans out of the workforce. 
    - Historic high black unemployment
    - Historic high female unemployment
    - Historic high working-age-teen unemployment

- "Obamacare" REAL numbers beginning to come out.....proving the disaster that Conservatives predicted.

- Historic high gap between wealth and poverty.

- Historic high number of Americans on Welfare and food stamps. 

- Historic high number of Americans below poverty level.

I read a "Facebook" post yesterday, declaring Obama the Greatest American President in history.

I'm assuming the sender was trying to goad me into engagement because, for the life of me, I'm unable to accept the notion that ANYONE is THAT stupid!

A reminder: Conservatism 101

Since Spring is a time of renewal, I thought it might be appropriate to remind folks of what Conservatism is all about. Or, more accurately, what distinguishes Conservatism from Liberalism.

There are two fundamentals for each of the two largest ideologies. These fundamentals are most importantly demonstrated through legislation.

Liberals believe:
- A person is free to make any choice, irrespective of whether that choice violates the rights of others.
- A person may make any choice, free of personal responsibility and personal consequence.

Conservatives believe:
- A person is free to make any choice, except where that choice violates the rights of others. 
- A person may make any choice, but is personally responsible for that choice and must personally accept all consequences of that choice. 

An example: abortion.

Since 1973, and as defended by, promoted by and expanded by Liberals, a woman, engaging in behavior whose possible outcomes include pregnancy, may choose to terminate that pregnancy at will, for any reason. She, legislatively, is beholden to NO personal responsibility, NO personal consequence.....for butchering an unborn child. That woman makes a choice which directly violates the rights of another human being. No responsibility, no consequence and grotesque violation of the rights of another human being.

THIS, in all it's savagery, is the very nature of Liberalism.

Of course, there are other examples: Affirmative Action, "Gay Marriage", Embryonic Stem Cell research, etc......all of these, through Democrat legislation, alleviate the choice-maker of responsibility, and seek to grant rights unequally, or remove rights altogether.

And it is what separates Liberals from Conservatives.

....which is why I am a Conservative.

Code words

So......these are 'code words' we are not allowed to use when describing Hillary:

• Ambitious
• Calculating
• Disingenuous
• Entitled
• Insincere
• Out of Touch
• Over Confident
• Polarizing
• Represent the Past
• Secretive
• Will Do Anything to Win

Got it? Now that we know the words and phrases we CAN'T use, I'd like to suggest some that we CAN use:

Money whore

Harpie

Power whore

Gutless coward

"3am" failure

Albatross (well.....that's more about her 'husband')

Back-biter

Piece of shit

You know what they say......

If you don't write it down, it never happened....

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/conncarroll/2015/03/26/white-house-confirms-iran-deal-probably-wont-be-in-writing-n1976666

Evidently, that letter.....worked.

A very important point here.....

Check out this video.....which has screened at the White House....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/03/20/white-house-film-festival-features-climate-change-movie-made-by-6-year-old/

This kid really DOES represent the Democrat (Marxist) Party. At 6 years old, he has neither the experience nor the vision to comprehend the climate of a planet, particularly in terms of whether human interaction has any affect.

This, in truth, IS the Democrat Party, who are, fundamentally, 6 year olds in arrested psychological, intellectual and emotional development.

This child, who was clearly brought up by breathtakingly ignorant parents, is now paraded like a circus geek or court jester in front of their king (Obama).

And Democrats fawn and swoon. And they celebrate the product of their agenda; ignorance by age 6.

C'mon, folks.......IT'S A SMOKESCREEN!!!!!

"Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain".....so goes the saying, from "The wizard of Oz".

Who is the "man" behind this curtain? Hillary, of course.

And, of course, I'm talking about the flap, the hype, the petition, the teeth-gnashing, the apoplexy surrounding the open letter to Iran.

This is smokescreen.

And it attempts to distract from, oh, a whole raft of Liberal nightmares; from Hillary's emails, to her lies about email exchanges with Bill, to the continuing revelations about Benghazi, to the complete failure of the economy, blah, blah, blah......

Folks: stay on point. Stay focused. This is what Liberals do.

....because the Liberal media, when not outright burying it, will be condemning and confabulating about this historic, brilliant, elegantly simple speech...

http://youtu.be/lELXynhbS84

No WONDER Democrats.....and Obama, in particular....hates him:

He is clear
He is concise
He is a powerful, commanding presence
He speaks plainly
He has conviction

....and he doesn't require a TelePrompTer

Please, share this post. It's important that folks understand what is at stake.

Please.....

I can't think of a greater endorsement for Walker's Conservative credentials.....

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/ex-mccain-adviser-calls-walker-dumb-a/?cat_orig=politics

2016

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/hillary-knew-emails-during-benghazi-attack-reported-terrorism/

Going into the 2016 election cycle

Every election cycle, I hear the same thing:

IF YOU REPUBLICANS WANT TO HAVE A CHANCE OF WINNING, YOU'D BETTER NOMINATE A MODERATE!

I hear it from the media.
I hear it from Liberals (who are CLEARLY just trying to help me...and Republicans...out...).
I hear it, even, from "moderate" Republicans.

And, I'm certain that the majority of Americans hear the same thing, repeated, ad nauseam.

But, as FAR too many things "media", FAR too many things "moderate" and nearly EVERYTHING Liberal, the notion that a Conservative cannot win the Presidency is, in a word:

BULLSHIT.

The greatest modern example? President Reagan, of course.

Now, while it CAN be reasonably argued that Reagan won in 1980 in reaction to President Carter who, by any reasonable standard, was an epic failure as a President, it does not explain how, in 1984, Reagan, who, by that time, had established his credentials as a true Conservative, won his bid for reelection.

So lopsided was Reagan's victory over Mondale (in 1984) that no other word could possibly apply other than "mandate".

By electoral vote:

1980 election:
Reagan: 489 electoral votes
Carter: 49 electoral votes

1984 election:
Reagan: 525 electoral votes
Mondale: 13 electoral votes

So, AFTER establishing himself as a Conservative, Reagan had a HIGHER electoral gain than his previous election win.

So.....AMERICAN VOTERS.....the record is absolutely clear: put a REAL Conservative against a Democrat, and the Conservative WILL win.

And the reverse, as seen by the last two elections, the opposite is true:

Obama vs McCain (who is a left-of-center moderate Republican):
Obama: 365 electoral votes
McCain: 173 electoral votes

Obama vs Romney (who is a right-of-center moderate Republican):
Obama: 201 electoral votes
Romney: 191 electoral votes

Even in the last two elections, the more Right-leaning the Republican candidate, the more electoral votes.

The bottom line is this:

The more Conservative the Presidential candidate, the more electoral votes garnered by the Republican Party. The more "moderate" and left-leaning the candidate, the fewer electoral votes for the Republican.

Why on Earth fair-minded voters listen to Liberals in the media, the Democrat Party and in the Republican Party is beyond my capacity to understand.

So, as the 2016 election season ramps up, I hope that you will keep these things in mind. And, I hope that you will dedicate yourselves to taking a stand:

- In favor of the Constitution
- In favor of Conservative principles
- In favor of American exceptionalism
- In favor of the family
- In favor of freedom
- In favor of Liberty
- In favor of our GOD-BESTOWED unalienable rights (worth reading: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/09/23/what-did-thomas-jefferson-mean-by-unalienable-rights/)

Because, if you are NOT in favor of these or are disinterested in defending these, then you WILL lose them.

America, folks, ISN'T just another country.

Rather, it is a shared vision of Liberty, which must be defended constantly from those, externally and internally, who seek to destroy that vision.

And, of all the forces allied against that vision, the most dangerous is The Democrat Party, who are Marxists, Statists, who seek to do to America what Communists did to the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, etc....

Is that REALLY the legacy you wish to leave to your children?

Well.....how about that?!

ANOTHER Democrat with a gun...

If Americans want to TRULY reduce gun violence, there is only one law that would make any sense:

DON'T ALLOW DEMOCRATS TO OWN OR POSSESS GUNS!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/02/11/vehement-atheist-charged-with-executing-3-muslims-students/

You DO know what's coming, don't you?

With all the (made up) flap about the Oscars.....dumb ol' Al Sharpton (who's as much a reverend as I am an admiral..), once again, attempting to "Brawley" another phony racial crime, I' truly surprised that I haven't yet seen the freight train that's heading our way.

To what do I refer?

Here's what's coming:

In future Oscars, there will be some added categories:

- Best black actor
- Best black actress
- Best black director
- Best screenplay, written by a black
- Best picture with predominantly black cast
- Best supporting black actor and actress
- Best black this, best black that, etc, etc, etc....

Now, the discrimination that pervades our American culture, from "Black history month" to B.E.T. to the Congressional Black Caucus, will be making its way to Hollywood awards.

The most pathetic and ironic thing?

Dr. Martin Luther King would be disgusted by this, as he only desired (rightly) equality.

But, sadly, Democrats have taken his message and turned it into a justification for EXACTLY the kind of discrimination Dr. King dreamed of ending.

You want hypocrisy? You want racism? You want sexism?

I give you THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!

Hollywood, which is about 99.999999999% Liberal Democrat, have released the Oscars list.

While, for the most, I pay absolutely NO attention to the "Hollywood blows Hollywood" award ceremony, this year's is, at least, mildly interesting......but only because it demonstrates the truth of The Democrat Party:

THEY are the "Party of racism".
THEY are the "Party of sexism".
THEY are the party of hypocrisy.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscars-acting-nominees-all-white-764018

And it doesn't end there....

Turns out that the nominees for "best Director".....are ALL MALES!!!!!!

Sorry, Angelina. Maybe your chumming for the wrong side.

Ya know......they kinda have a point......

The idiots in the Left Wing are refusing to characterize the attacks in France as acts of ISLAMIC terrorism. Like the Democrats' psychotic "workplace violence" claim for the Fort Hood incident, the acts of Islamic terrorism in France are being characterized as anything but.

They aren't Islamists.
This isn't about Islam.

But, in truth (and they'll probably find this out too late), the Liberals DO have point.

These radical ISLAMISTS are only doing what Liberals do: taking something fundamental and applying Marx to it.

Radical Islam works off the Socialist playbook, pure and simple. Stalin and Hitler did it; in their cases, they replaced God with State (like what's happening in America right now...). But the bottom line is that it's about control.....ABSOLUTE control. And the methods to achieve that control are spelled out in any Socialist propaganda sheet.....from the Al Qaeda handbook to "Rules for Radicals". And the followers have ranged from Osama bin Laden to Bill Ayers.

So you see, all these mischaracterizations AREN'T particularly inaccurate.....

We MUST consider the fact that ALL these idiots have one thing in common:

They are STATISTS.

Whether you call them Fascists, Communists, Socialists, Progressives, Liberals or The Democrat Party, they are STATISTS.

Want to win the war on terror?

Defeat STATISM.

Great news?

...ONLY if you DON'T consider the fact that the Obamas just bought a home in Palm Springs......

http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/senator-barbara-boxer-is-retiring-20150108

Is anyone surprised?

http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/new-york-mayors-secret-past-comes-to-light/

Let's be VERY clear about something:

This isn't an isolated, one-off, out of character, thing.

This is the Democrat Party.

PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL?

Prediction

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/07/10-times-western-cowards-trashed-free-speech-to-defend-islam/

Some idiot (and by idiot, I mean Democrat), while defending the free speech of France, will forward legislation either banning "hate speech against Islam" or make "hate speech against Islam" a sentence enhancement for crime.

Democrats doing what Democrats do.

Why people continue to support them is baffling to me.....

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/who-is-jeffrey-epstein-a-study-of-the-man-linked-to-worlds-of-celebrity-politics--and-royalty-9954397.html

Liberals THINK they have great news!

Liberals have been having "happy seizures" about third quarter numbers. It's pretty much the ONLY thing they've been able to point to by way of Party accomplishment!

So, it would seem...to them...that their "tax-the-shit-out-of-them", "force them to buy crappy, expensive healthcare", "force them into sub-standard schools", "confiscate their guns", "set up thousands of new regulations", "butcher as many unborn children as possible.....especially the black ones", is working!

America, as envisioned by the Democrat Party, is turning into a Stalin-esque utopia.

Hooray for them.

But....wait a minute.....

Shouldn't the mindless followers of the Democrat Party be asking "WHY?".....as in "WHY does the economy look so darn healthy right now?"

Because if they did, they'd pretty much be able to nail it down to three things:

- Obamacare (or really, the lack thereof)
- Government handouts
- OIL.

Obamacare: mandatory regulations under the ACA have continued to be pushed back to later dates. Why? Because the Democrats KNOW, FOR FACT, that Obamacare is a GIGANTIC money hole and a failure. All these necessary programs, deemed SO urgent when bum-rushing the legislation through, don't really seem that urgent now; especially since the Democrats KNOW, FOR FACT, that Obamacare will sink our economy.

Government handouts: Most folks don't know that part of the GDP is Government spending; which is at it's historic highest.

Oil:  Yes, oil. Largely because of alternative collecting methods (like fracking), the US is producing more (in spite of the Democrats attempts to shut off oil production and sink the American economy) and selling more abroad. That action forces the price of oil down, since OPEC has to respond by upping it's own production. Together, this drops the price of oil. As price of oil drops, everything related to oil (from delivery costs to CD production) drop in price. As prices drop, purchases and profit go up. That's how it works, folks.

But there IS one, VERY funny thing that those celebrating Democrats aren't considering:

With regard to oil, the more it's drops in price, the more it INCREASES in consumption!

So, Democrats are celebrating a HUGE increase in the CONSUMPTION of oil!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.......

Well, no one could ever accuse Democrats of over-using their brains.....

2015

I never make New Years resolutions, other than the same one every year:

I vow, in 2015, to continue to step up my game in political/ideological/philosophical, etc, engagement. I vow to learn more, to research more, to seek answers more. I vow to be more patient in my listening skills. I vow NOT to allow ignorant, misleading and untruthful statements stand without correcting them. I vow to write more, to debate more. with regard to THE MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT....abortion.....I vow to continue the fight to ban it and bring our country back to it's Constitutional principles and, in doing so, protect and defend the lives of our most innocent.

Folks,

If one thing is clear, it is this: without an educated, thoughtful citizenry, this country will fail. The greatest nation will be no more; we will have squandered our precious gift of freedom.

For me, I won't allow that to happen and am prepared to defend that freedom by any means necessary.

If you are of a like mind, here's what I recommend:

Education (SELF-education) is the key to maintaining our freedom and liberties. Here are three web sites (all non-partisan, all simple to navigate, all VERY comprehensive) which provide great research tools.

- KNOW your candidates before your vote
- KNOW the issues before your vote
- Then, when the election is over: WATCH THOSE CANDIDATES AND ISSUES AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE PERFORMING AS PROMISED!!!

Web Sites:

http://cagw.org/ Citizens against Government Waste

http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm On The Issues

http://votesmart.org/ Project Vote Smart

HAPPY NEW YEAR, EVERYONE!