http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/09/30/video-abc-correspondent-grills-wh-spokesman-on-obamas-isis-blame-game-n1898353
I can see the headlines now: "White House Spokesman wins 'Dancing with the Stars'"!
And what a dance it is.
Faced with direct quotes, timelines and facts, the tap dance was two left feet.
BUT....at least he didn't do the usual "blame Bush" this time.
Rather, he drove the bus over the Iraqis. Nice.
The bottom line is this:
Iraq is a disaster BECAUSE our idiot-in-chief pulled the US troops out. Period.
Bush warned him about it.
Romney warned him about it.
But like the gutless radical-wannabe that he is, he opted to do the popular thing (popular to the rest of the gutless radical-wannabes in the US).
Folks, evidently, YOU wanted 'coward' and 'incompetent'.
Well.....you got it.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Monday, September 29, 2014
October surprise? No. Not exactly.
What we WILL see.....GUARANTEED....is a lot of October LIES.
This is how the Democrats do it:
Starting, likely, the second week of October, on a Friday night, news will start coming out in various key Senate and Congressional states.
The news?
"Rumors" of Republican candidate wrongdoing. Sometimes strong suggestions of wrongdoing. Sometimes outright accusations of wrongdoing.
You'll be hearing everything.
It will ALL be strongly suggested that Hitler and Stalin did the same types of things.
"...reminiscent of the 40's...." and other highly-suggestive phrases will be laced into conversations and reports.
Then, the talk shows (TV) will be "debating" the worth and truth of these.....but will come up ultimately inconclusive.
There won't be time for the truth to get out.
And, of course, the truth will be this:
They will ALL be fabrications. Lies. Deliberate lies.
That's how they'll do it.
And it might just work.
It will depend ONLY on how intelligent YOU are.
This is how the Democrats do it:
Starting, likely, the second week of October, on a Friday night, news will start coming out in various key Senate and Congressional states.
The news?
"Rumors" of Republican candidate wrongdoing. Sometimes strong suggestions of wrongdoing. Sometimes outright accusations of wrongdoing.
You'll be hearing everything.
It will ALL be strongly suggested that Hitler and Stalin did the same types of things.
"...reminiscent of the 40's...." and other highly-suggestive phrases will be laced into conversations and reports.
Then, the talk shows (TV) will be "debating" the worth and truth of these.....but will come up ultimately inconclusive.
There won't be time for the truth to get out.
And, of course, the truth will be this:
They will ALL be fabrications. Lies. Deliberate lies.
That's how they'll do it.
And it might just work.
It will depend ONLY on how intelligent YOU are.
Let's clarify something.....
So, now, the Secret Service boss (Director Julia Pierson) is going to get a grilling about the prostitution ring, the 1000+ security breaches, all capped by a nut case penetrating DEEP into the White House before being apprehended.
Darn it, they've GOT to get some solid answers!
Folks, it no investigation is necessary.
Consider some other recent, notable, failures:
- "Fast and Furious"
- The IRS (targeting Conservative groups at the direction of Eric Holder)
- Myriad "workplace violence" incidences (involving terrorist wannabes, tied to larger, REAL terrorist groups)
I'll stop there. Listing them all will take days.
Anyway, there IS a common denominator, folks.
Ever heard the phrase "the fish rots from the head down"?
Darn it, they've GOT to get some solid answers!
Folks, it no investigation is necessary.
Consider some other recent, notable, failures:
- "Fast and Furious"
- The IRS (targeting Conservative groups at the direction of Eric Holder)
- Myriad "workplace violence" incidences (involving terrorist wannabes, tied to larger, REAL terrorist groups)
I'll stop there. Listing them all will take days.
Anyway, there IS a common denominator, folks.
Ever heard the phrase "the fish rots from the head down"?
Who. exactly, is "everybody"?
Josh Earnest, Obama's press secretary, said today, "I think the way that I would describe it is that everybody did - that everybody was surprised to see the rapid advance that ISIL was able to make from Syria across the Iraqi border and to be able to take over large swaths of territory in Iraq - did come as a surprise."
A surprise to whom, Josh? Who, exactly, is "everybody"?
Because Conservatives have been warning about this since Obama first suggested pulling troops from Iraq which, BTW, was during his first-term campaign.
President Bush (who really ISN'T a true Conservative) said it.
Romney (who really ISN'T a true Conservative) said it.
Nearly EVERY Conservative pundit said it.
Even I said it (be sure to check the dates....):
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/search?q=descent+into+hell
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/12/descent-into-hell.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2014/06/iran-iraq.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2014/01/thank-you-barry-and-hillary.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-is-this-possible.html
(These are just a few of the related pieces I've written)
So, Earnest, it would seem that "everybody" is "Democrats". DEMOCRATS were taken by surprise.
DEMOCRATS had no idea that ISIL (ISIS) (by the way.....if you're going to "Obama" the use of ISIL, you probably should have said that they came from the "Levant", NOT "Syria")
There are only two groups of people who constitute "everybody" here:
1. The willfully ignorant.
2. The breathtakingly stupid.
Of course, they are ALL Democrats....
Two lessons:
1. For Obama: this is what you get when you put stupid people in charge.
2. For Americans: THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU PUT A STUPID PERSON IN CHARGE!
A surprise to whom, Josh? Who, exactly, is "everybody"?
Because Conservatives have been warning about this since Obama first suggested pulling troops from Iraq which, BTW, was during his first-term campaign.
President Bush (who really ISN'T a true Conservative) said it.
Romney (who really ISN'T a true Conservative) said it.
Nearly EVERY Conservative pundit said it.
Even I said it (be sure to check the dates....):
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/search?q=descent+into+hell
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/12/descent-into-hell.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2014/06/iran-iraq.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2014/01/thank-you-barry-and-hillary.html
http://brainycattle.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-is-this-possible.html
(These are just a few of the related pieces I've written)
So, Earnest, it would seem that "everybody" is "Democrats". DEMOCRATS were taken by surprise.
DEMOCRATS had no idea that ISIL (ISIS) (by the way.....if you're going to "Obama" the use of ISIL, you probably should have said that they came from the "Levant", NOT "Syria")
There are only two groups of people who constitute "everybody" here:
1. The willfully ignorant.
2. The breathtakingly stupid.
Of course, they are ALL Democrats....
Two lessons:
1. For Obama: this is what you get when you put stupid people in charge.
2. For Americans: THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU PUT A STUPID PERSON IN CHARGE!
Saturday, September 27, 2014
An EXTREMELY important read
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/09/15/San-Francisco-Chronicle-Rejects-Prop-45
Monday, September 22, 2014
My point, EXACTLY!
Intentions or results: which is more important?
If you tell people that you are going to give to the poor, but then do NOT give to the poor?
If you say nothing, but then give to the poor?
If you take money from someone and tell them that it's going to be spent on a child's schooling (as an example), then turn around and spend that money on a long vacation for yourself?
How about if you pay a child's tuition, then ask others to do the same (by themselves, out of their own good fortune)?
Folks, these are but a few examples, demonstrating the difference between intention-based and result-based thinking.....and acting.
And, although it might SEEM obvious that results are FAR, FAR more important than intentions, the reality is that it ISN'T so obvious. In fact, its what divides our country.
In truth, this is EXACTLY the difference between Liberals (Democrats, "RINO" Republicans, etc) and Conservatives.
Liberals are intention-based thinkers and 'doers'.
Conservatives are results-based thinkers and 'doers'.
Examples? Sure, a couple:
Public schools. Liberals, intending to good for the children, take more and more of your money and waste it ever-decreasing academic achievement.
"Tax the rich". Liberals, who profess to be on the side of the poor and middle class, tax the wealthy and successful are FAR higher rates and in FAR more ways than any other group of people. Yet, the poor get poorer and the middle class descend into poverty.
And now: the environment: "Save the planet"
Liberals intend to save the planet.....to save "Mother Earth". Yet, when they go to their demonstrations, demanding environmental attention, THIS is what you get:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/22/litterbugs-climate-marchers-leave-piles-of-trash-behind
Is this an isolated incident? Nope. EVERY rally where Liberals are involved ends up with TONS and TONS of trash thrown everywhere.....except the trash receptacles.....
Folks,
The "Do as I say, not as I do" mentality reigns supreme in the Democrat Party. Intentions, to them, ARE the most important thing. "As long as I intend to do something, it's the same as actually doing it"......
How will YOU vote?
Who will YOU support?
Will you support people who intend to do good and, at best, do nothing at all (at worst, they cause HUGE harm through their actions and intentions)
Or will you, instead, vote for results-based people who DO?
If you tell people that you are going to give to the poor, but then do NOT give to the poor?
If you say nothing, but then give to the poor?
If you take money from someone and tell them that it's going to be spent on a child's schooling (as an example), then turn around and spend that money on a long vacation for yourself?
How about if you pay a child's tuition, then ask others to do the same (by themselves, out of their own good fortune)?
Folks, these are but a few examples, demonstrating the difference between intention-based and result-based thinking.....and acting.
And, although it might SEEM obvious that results are FAR, FAR more important than intentions, the reality is that it ISN'T so obvious. In fact, its what divides our country.
In truth, this is EXACTLY the difference between Liberals (Democrats, "RINO" Republicans, etc) and Conservatives.
Liberals are intention-based thinkers and 'doers'.
Conservatives are results-based thinkers and 'doers'.
Examples? Sure, a couple:
Public schools. Liberals, intending to good for the children, take more and more of your money and waste it ever-decreasing academic achievement.
"Tax the rich". Liberals, who profess to be on the side of the poor and middle class, tax the wealthy and successful are FAR higher rates and in FAR more ways than any other group of people. Yet, the poor get poorer and the middle class descend into poverty.
And now: the environment: "Save the planet"
Liberals intend to save the planet.....to save "Mother Earth". Yet, when they go to their demonstrations, demanding environmental attention, THIS is what you get:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/22/litterbugs-climate-marchers-leave-piles-of-trash-behind
Is this an isolated incident? Nope. EVERY rally where Liberals are involved ends up with TONS and TONS of trash thrown everywhere.....except the trash receptacles.....
Folks,
The "Do as I say, not as I do" mentality reigns supreme in the Democrat Party. Intentions, to them, ARE the most important thing. "As long as I intend to do something, it's the same as actually doing it"......
How will YOU vote?
Who will YOU support?
Will you support people who intend to do good and, at best, do nothing at all (at worst, they cause HUGE harm through their actions and intentions)
Or will you, instead, vote for results-based people who DO?
Slavery....it's a Democrat thing.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/caravan-hits-america-with-startling-message/
Remember when I........
Remember when I mention Democrat "talking points"......how I say "was that on the Socialist talking points memo this morning"?
Well, I'm not joking when I suggest this.
.....because here it is:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/18/Michelle-Obama-s-School-Lunch-Program-Wastes-Millions
Well, I'm not joking when I suggest this.
.....because here it is:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/18/Michelle-Obama-s-School-Lunch-Program-Wastes-Millions
Sunday, September 21, 2014
So....I'm kind of wondering....
Since we have a VERY pro gun control administration, shouldn't the White House be a "gun free zone"?
http://news.yahoo.com/security-breach-prompts-more-white-house-security-092415494--politics.html
http://news.yahoo.com/security-breach-prompts-more-white-house-security-092415494--politics.html
Think it's any different, here, in America?
Bottom line:
Put Democrats in charge of anything.....ANYTHING.....and this is what you'll get.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/20/Environmental-researcher-wind-industry-riddled-with-absolute-corruption
Put Democrats in charge of anything.....ANYTHING.....and this is what you'll get.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/20/Environmental-researcher-wind-industry-riddled-with-absolute-corruption
Saturday, September 20, 2014
I'll spell it out....
http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/dem-congressman-40-american-isis-fighters-back-in-u-s/?cat_orig=us
If you haven't already come to this rather obvious conclusion or, for whatever reason, don't really understand the 'why' or, once you HAVE arrived at the only possible conclusion, simply cannot believe it.......let me spell it out:
THE DEMOCRATS WANT TERRORISTS TO ATTACK AMERICANS...IN AMERICA.
As to the "why":
1. This is part of the radical handbook. Acts of terrorism cower the citizenry, making them compliant....ripe for submission to authority. Continued threats keep them in line.
2. Democrats are setting up the circumstances to make them look like hawks (really, saviors to Liberals). (Go research the Cuban Missile Crisis.......)
3. Democrats are also, as a contingency, setting up the circumstances to condemn any action taken by a Republican President (should one be elected), should that terrorist attack happen under a different administration. (Think 9/11).
Folks, this is nothing more than an aspect of radicalism. Obama IS a radical Socialist. This IS part of the playbook.
To the "Obama is a true patriot" crowd:
You are cattle and you are too stupid to survive. Please don't breed.
If you haven't already come to this rather obvious conclusion or, for whatever reason, don't really understand the 'why' or, once you HAVE arrived at the only possible conclusion, simply cannot believe it.......let me spell it out:
THE DEMOCRATS WANT TERRORISTS TO ATTACK AMERICANS...IN AMERICA.
As to the "why":
1. This is part of the radical handbook. Acts of terrorism cower the citizenry, making them compliant....ripe for submission to authority. Continued threats keep them in line.
2. Democrats are setting up the circumstances to make them look like hawks (really, saviors to Liberals). (Go research the Cuban Missile Crisis.......)
3. Democrats are also, as a contingency, setting up the circumstances to condemn any action taken by a Republican President (should one be elected), should that terrorist attack happen under a different administration. (Think 9/11).
Folks, this is nothing more than an aspect of radicalism. Obama IS a radical Socialist. This IS part of the playbook.
To the "Obama is a true patriot" crowd:
You are cattle and you are too stupid to survive. Please don't breed.
How many opportunities do we have left to preserve our Republic?
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/06/16/Op-Ed-Rules-for-Successful-Conservative-Activists
Worth considering....
http://theconservativeactivist.com/info/
....and remember:
....and remember:
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Friday, September 19, 2014
I have a question.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Iraq-Syria-conflict-US/2014/09/19/id/595755/
How are you going to know that they got the right person(s)? He IS masked, after all.
Oh, and......voice ID? Sure. Unless they did a voiceover. (Again.....he's (she's?) masked.
If we REALLY want to stop these idiots.....kill them. ALL of them.
How are you going to know that they got the right person(s)? He IS masked, after all.
Oh, and......voice ID? Sure. Unless they did a voiceover. (Again.....he's (she's?) masked.
If we REALLY want to stop these idiots.....kill them. ALL of them.
Remarkable.
So much for national security.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/18/Ted-Cruz-Senate-Democrats-Abandon-Hillary-Clinton-s-Support-For-Revoking-U-S-Citizenship-From-Terrorists
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/18/Ted-Cruz-Senate-Democrats-Abandon-Hillary-Clinton-s-Support-For-Revoking-U-S-Citizenship-From-Terrorists
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Sad realities for the peaceniks (Liberals, Democrats)
Here are some fun (moronic) anti-war slogans, LOVED by Liberals....
War Is SO 20th Century
When Bush Comes To Shove
War Is A Dick Thing, Peace Is A Heart Thing
George Dubya: Weapon Of Mass Distraction
Drop Bush, Not Bombs
If War Is The Answer We're Asking The Wrong Question
Killing Innocent People Is The Problem, Not The Solution
Save America, Spare Iraq, Make Texas Take Him Back
Real Patriots Drive Hybrids
Drop Names, Not Bombs
Who Would Jesus Bomb?
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease
There Is No Path To Peace - Peace IS The Path
Justice Or Just Us?
Tame The Tyrant In The Mirror, Then The One In Iraq
Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld: Axis Of Weasel
Go Solar, Not Ballistic
Nonviolence, Not Nonexistence
A Village In Texas Has Lost Its Idiot
How Many Lives Per Gallon?
How Did Our Oil Get Under Their Soil?
Regime Change Begins At Home
No Hitting (held by young girl)
No Oilgarchy (Oilgarchy in circle with slash across it)
God Does Not Bless Only America
Rich Man's War, Poor Man's Blood
Has Anyone Seen Our Constitution Lately?
What If God Blesses Iraq?
Born To Kill, Born To Drill
Let's Try Preemptive Peace
Our Grief Is Not A Cry For War
If You Are Not Outraged You Are Not Paying Attention
Make Soup Not War
Smart Bombs Don't Justify Dumb Leaders
We Have Guided Missiles And Misguided Men
Who's The Unelected Tyrant With The Bomb?
Peaceful Solution Not Daddy's Retribution
Make Tea Not War
All Humanity Is Downwind
My President Is A Psychopath
Relax, George
A couple "411"s to the "peace at any price" Democrats (and Liberal Republicans):
1. "No war for oil"? How did you get to the demonstration? What are you wearing? Own any CD's, iPods, cell phones? Use electricity at your commune? Fly anywhere? Drive anywhere?
Before you protest America's protection of our oil sources, go ahead an live without oil or oil products for a while. Until then, you'd BETTER understand that oil IS a matter of National Security and, therefore, must be protected.
That said, does it make sense to explore alternate energy sources? Of course! Every Republican President, in their budgets, calls for a balanced energy portfolio. Understand? BALANCED. In other words: explore and develop alternate energy sources, but NOT at the expense of oil. (Find a Democrat who feels the same......good luck).
2. Liberals tend to only protest "war" when a Republican is in the White House. Right now is a perfect example: Obama has expanded our efforts in Afghanistan and is now ramping up Iraq. Any word from the peaceniks? Pretty much nope.
3. "If War Is The Answer We're Asking The Wrong Question". Probably my favorite from these idiots. And, in a sense, they ARE right, since the question THEY ask is "war or peace?". That ISN'T the right question. The RIGHT question is "war or something FAR worse than war?". Unless you like captivity, the answer IS "war".
4. Now, let's take a little look at history....
The Liberals who protest war, while they HATE Republican Presidents, always....ALWAYS....vote for Democrats. ALWAYS. Yet, under which Presidencies did America become involved in these:
- WWI?
- WWII?
- Korea?
- Vietnam?
Answer: DEMOCRATS.
So you see, peaceniks, war is a potential reality, irrespective of Presidency and, in fact, the greatest conflict in modern times have, more often then not, had a Democrat at the helm. So, if you REALLY hate war, you'd be LESS likely to have to deal with this horrible alternative with a Republican in the Oval Office.
One more thing to consider:
You peaceniks really need to look at BOTH sides, when it comes to whether or not America enters into armed conflict. America, if you actually do the research, is loathe to conduct war. The problem is: our enemies don't care about that. To them, war is THE ONLY POSSIBLE ANSWER, since they know, FOR FACT, that YOU, peaceniks, will cripple America and her efforts to seek peace or, when necessary, fight and win. (Go read the memoirs of our past enemies in the 20th Century.....nearly ALL of them depended on YOU (useful idiots) to hobble America.
And you don't need to look that far back: look what is happening in Iraq RIGHT NOW.
Idiots.
War Is SO 20th Century
When Bush Comes To Shove
War Is A Dick Thing, Peace Is A Heart Thing
George Dubya: Weapon Of Mass Distraction
Drop Bush, Not Bombs
If War Is The Answer We're Asking The Wrong Question
Killing Innocent People Is The Problem, Not The Solution
Save America, Spare Iraq, Make Texas Take Him Back
Real Patriots Drive Hybrids
Drop Names, Not Bombs
Who Would Jesus Bomb?
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease
There Is No Path To Peace - Peace IS The Path
Justice Or Just Us?
Tame The Tyrant In The Mirror, Then The One In Iraq
Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld: Axis Of Weasel
Go Solar, Not Ballistic
Nonviolence, Not Nonexistence
A Village In Texas Has Lost Its Idiot
How Many Lives Per Gallon?
How Did Our Oil Get Under Their Soil?
Regime Change Begins At Home
No Hitting (held by young girl)
No Oilgarchy (Oilgarchy in circle with slash across it)
God Does Not Bless Only America
Rich Man's War, Poor Man's Blood
Has Anyone Seen Our Constitution Lately?
What If God Blesses Iraq?
Born To Kill, Born To Drill
Let's Try Preemptive Peace
Our Grief Is Not A Cry For War
If You Are Not Outraged You Are Not Paying Attention
Make Soup Not War
Smart Bombs Don't Justify Dumb Leaders
We Have Guided Missiles And Misguided Men
Who's The Unelected Tyrant With The Bomb?
Peaceful Solution Not Daddy's Retribution
Make Tea Not War
All Humanity Is Downwind
My President Is A Psychopath
Relax, George
A couple "411"s to the "peace at any price" Democrats (and Liberal Republicans):
1. "No war for oil"? How did you get to the demonstration? What are you wearing? Own any CD's, iPods, cell phones? Use electricity at your commune? Fly anywhere? Drive anywhere?
Before you protest America's protection of our oil sources, go ahead an live without oil or oil products for a while. Until then, you'd BETTER understand that oil IS a matter of National Security and, therefore, must be protected.
That said, does it make sense to explore alternate energy sources? Of course! Every Republican President, in their budgets, calls for a balanced energy portfolio. Understand? BALANCED. In other words: explore and develop alternate energy sources, but NOT at the expense of oil. (Find a Democrat who feels the same......good luck).
2. Liberals tend to only protest "war" when a Republican is in the White House. Right now is a perfect example: Obama has expanded our efforts in Afghanistan and is now ramping up Iraq. Any word from the peaceniks? Pretty much nope.
3. "If War Is The Answer We're Asking The Wrong Question". Probably my favorite from these idiots. And, in a sense, they ARE right, since the question THEY ask is "war or peace?". That ISN'T the right question. The RIGHT question is "war or something FAR worse than war?". Unless you like captivity, the answer IS "war".
4. Now, let's take a little look at history....
The Liberals who protest war, while they HATE Republican Presidents, always....ALWAYS....vote for Democrats. ALWAYS. Yet, under which Presidencies did America become involved in these:
- WWI?
- WWII?
- Korea?
- Vietnam?
Answer: DEMOCRATS.
So you see, peaceniks, war is a potential reality, irrespective of Presidency and, in fact, the greatest conflict in modern times have, more often then not, had a Democrat at the helm. So, if you REALLY hate war, you'd be LESS likely to have to deal with this horrible alternative with a Republican in the Oval Office.
One more thing to consider:
You peaceniks really need to look at BOTH sides, when it comes to whether or not America enters into armed conflict. America, if you actually do the research, is loathe to conduct war. The problem is: our enemies don't care about that. To them, war is THE ONLY POSSIBLE ANSWER, since they know, FOR FACT, that YOU, peaceniks, will cripple America and her efforts to seek peace or, when necessary, fight and win. (Go read the memoirs of our past enemies in the 20th Century.....nearly ALL of them depended on YOU (useful idiots) to hobble America.
And you don't need to look that far back: look what is happening in Iraq RIGHT NOW.
Idiots.
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
A mea culpa moment for Democrats? A "V8" moment for Democrats?
My GOD! COULD IT POSSIBLY BE????
Have the Democrats FINALLY realized that Benghazi WAS an EPIC disaster and that HILLARY was the cause??????
In a word: no.
If you believe that it IS an open-eyes thing for the Democrats, then you are stupid.
Sorry. You are stupid if you actually believe that.
Think about it:
You REALLY wonder what this revelation is about?
Ask yourself:
When's the election?
Have the Democrats FINALLY realized that Benghazi WAS an EPIC disaster and that HILLARY was the cause??????
In a word: no.
If you believe that it IS an open-eyes thing for the Democrats, then you are stupid.
Sorry. You are stupid if you actually believe that.
Think about it:
You REALLY wonder what this revelation is about?
Ask yourself:
When's the election?
So......WHY do Democrats push for single parenting and "gay marriage"?
Simple: the children.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/08/how-single-motherhood-hurts-kids/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/new-study-on-homosexual-parents-tops-all-previous-research
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/08/how-single-motherhood-hurts-kids/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/new-study-on-homosexual-parents-tops-all-previous-research
Idiot
Remember this idiot's party (Democrat) when election comes.....
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/17/democrat-congresswoman-blames-reporters-for-their-beheadings-says-they-should-be-more-careful/
Eddie Bernice Johnson. Idiot. Democrat.
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/17/democrat-congresswoman-blames-reporters-for-their-beheadings-says-they-should-be-more-careful/
Eddie Bernice Johnson. Idiot. Democrat.
Who are the REAL racists and bigots?
I'm curious.....
Liberals, why, do you suppose, the mainstream media is ignoring Biden's latest gaffe:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2014/09/17/gaffeprone-vice-president-steps-in-it-again-n1892961
After all, if Biden were a Republican, his use of "shylock" would IMMEDIATELY be picked up by ALL the major networks, and it'd be THE ONLY story for days. The Republican Biden would be called a racist and a bigot. Comparison's to Nazi Germany would make their way into the op-ed pages, HuffPo, etc.
But, to the mainstream media, there are two HUGE problems with this incident:
- Biden is a Democrat
- His offensive language was aimed (only) at Jews....and, EVEN THOUGH THEY OVERWHELMINGLY VOTE DEMOCRAT, Democrats don't give a rat's ass about Jews.
America, when are you going to wake up and stop this?
Liberals, why, do you suppose, the mainstream media is ignoring Biden's latest gaffe:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2014/09/17/gaffeprone-vice-president-steps-in-it-again-n1892961
After all, if Biden were a Republican, his use of "shylock" would IMMEDIATELY be picked up by ALL the major networks, and it'd be THE ONLY story for days. The Republican Biden would be called a racist and a bigot. Comparison's to Nazi Germany would make their way into the op-ed pages, HuffPo, etc.
But, to the mainstream media, there are two HUGE problems with this incident:
- Biden is a Democrat
- His offensive language was aimed (only) at Jews....and, EVEN THOUGH THEY OVERWHELMINGLY VOTE DEMOCRAT, Democrats don't give a rat's ass about Jews.
America, when are you going to wake up and stop this?
Sunday, September 14, 2014
What does he mean "if"?
http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2014/09/14/Obama-As-ISIS-Adviser
Obama's lack of understanding on display.
FOLKS:
THIS is what you get when you a) fail to do the research....TWICE, b) trust a politician...ANY POLITICIAN and c) elect into the highest executive management position a person who has never managed....at ANY level.
The Democrats are already sharpening their shears for the 2016 fleecing.
Based on the soon-to-be-aired "Madam Secretary", their clear frontrunner is Hillary. The Democrats KNOW, FOR FACT, that their constituents....their flock...will watch this load of fignya and, without question, accept is as gospel truth.
Democrats are like that. No need for fact. No need for research. No need for common sense.
If their gods say it, it is absolute truth.
The people on the other side.....the sentient, common sense thinkers.....MUST fight. You MUST be an activist. You MUST do whatever it takes to stop this relentless push toward Socialism.
REMEMBER:
Socialism has NEVER taken over political systems, where the citizenry actively opposed it.
Obama's lack of understanding on display.
FOLKS:
THIS is what you get when you a) fail to do the research....TWICE, b) trust a politician...ANY POLITICIAN and c) elect into the highest executive management position a person who has never managed....at ANY level.
The Democrats are already sharpening their shears for the 2016 fleecing.
Based on the soon-to-be-aired "Madam Secretary", their clear frontrunner is Hillary. The Democrats KNOW, FOR FACT, that their constituents....their flock...will watch this load of fignya and, without question, accept is as gospel truth.
Democrats are like that. No need for fact. No need for research. No need for common sense.
If their gods say it, it is absolute truth.
The people on the other side.....the sentient, common sense thinkers.....MUST fight. You MUST be an activist. You MUST do whatever it takes to stop this relentless push toward Socialism.
REMEMBER:
Socialism has NEVER taken over political systems, where the citizenry actively opposed it.
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Building the Socialist "utopia"
I have long contended that the goal of The Democrat Party is the same as any other Socialist political party, from Soviet Russia to "Nazi" Germany to China to Cuba to Venezuela.
That goal is this:
The destruction of the notion and practice of "family".
There exist myriad examples:
- Hillary Clinton's book "it takes a village to raise a child"
- Roe v Wade and the entire pro-abortion movement
- Welfare
- "Gay marriage"
- LGBT movement'
- "Women's rights" movement
- The "Children's bill of rights"
- NOW
- NARAL
- The "feminist" movement
- The National Women's Political Caucus
ALL these issues are driven by, supported by, pushed by, defended by.....The Democrat Party.
What I haven't generally discussed is the "WHY".....
To this, there are two goals:
- The destruction of "God" (replaced by the state)
- The construction of a compliant citizenry.
To the second point, it MUST begin with the children. Consider:
http://futureofchildren.org/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=37&articleid=107§ionid=692
http://www.newsweek.com/study-says-martial-woes-hit-children-rich-and-poor-differently-269380
Children of single parents:
- More likely to have drug problems
- More likely to commit crime
- More likely to drop out of school
- Less likely to graduate from high school
- More likely to experience depression
- etc etc etc.
In fact, there isn't a SINGLE "positive" statistic.
So, it is ABSOLUTELY clear. ABSOLUTELY UNEQUIVOCAL:
The WORST possible way to raise a child is in a single parent family.
And, what is ALSO ABSOLUTELY CLEAR ANS UNEQUIVOCAL is this:
Forcing children to be raised in single family homes IS THE GOAL OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
So, now I have to ask:
What are YOU going to do about it?
That goal is this:
The destruction of the notion and practice of "family".
There exist myriad examples:
- Hillary Clinton's book "it takes a village to raise a child"
- Roe v Wade and the entire pro-abortion movement
- Welfare
- "Gay marriage"
- LGBT movement'
- "Women's rights" movement
- The "Children's bill of rights"
- NOW
- NARAL
- The "feminist" movement
- The National Women's Political Caucus
ALL these issues are driven by, supported by, pushed by, defended by.....The Democrat Party.
What I haven't generally discussed is the "WHY".....
To this, there are two goals:
- The destruction of "God" (replaced by the state)
- The construction of a compliant citizenry.
To the second point, it MUST begin with the children. Consider:
http://futureofchildren.org/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=37&articleid=107§ionid=692
http://www.newsweek.com/study-says-martial-woes-hit-children-rich-and-poor-differently-269380
Children of single parents:
- More likely to have drug problems
- More likely to commit crime
- More likely to drop out of school
- Less likely to graduate from high school
- More likely to experience depression
- etc etc etc.
In fact, there isn't a SINGLE "positive" statistic.
So, it is ABSOLUTELY clear. ABSOLUTELY UNEQUIVOCAL:
The WORST possible way to raise a child is in a single parent family.
And, what is ALSO ABSOLUTELY CLEAR ANS UNEQUIVOCAL is this:
Forcing children to be raised in single family homes IS THE GOAL OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
So, now I have to ask:
What are YOU going to do about it?
CONGRATULATIONS, Conservatives!
Congratulations, Conservatives!
Because you CONTINUE to do absolutely nothing to stop the creeping Socialism (the Democrats), their ultimate agenda....the destruction of the family.....is, in fact, taking place.
Goodbye, America. Hello, USSR?
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/marriage-unmarried-adults-percentage/2014/09/12/id/594414/
Because you CONTINUE to do absolutely nothing to stop the creeping Socialism (the Democrats), their ultimate agenda....the destruction of the family.....is, in fact, taking place.
Goodbye, America. Hello, USSR?
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/marriage-unmarried-adults-percentage/2014/09/12/id/594414/
Thursday, September 11, 2014
A POWERFUL lesson in history......
Please, folks....PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.......send this to EVERYONE.
100% of the person to person debates I have about the upcoming election (2016) revolves around one....and only one....thought:
"The ONLY chance the Republicans have to win is to have a "moderate" run".
I hear this CONSTANTLY. CONSTANTLY!
Well, folks, I'm here to tell you...and them.....that that is WRONG.
In fact, I'll go further:
If the Republicans nominate a Conservative (a REAL Conservative; NOT a CINO), they will win, and they will win BIG!
Crystal ball? Sort of, but MY crystal ball sees the past.
And here's what it sees:
In the 1980 general elections, Jimmy Carter (the SECOND worst President in US history...and an extremist Liberal) was up against Ronald Reagan.
As the incumbent, Carter had the clear advantage (incumbents always do).
In addition, the press, of course, was as the press is now: Liberal to the extreme, which meant that they did EVERYTHING they could to prop up Carter and expended equal or greater amounts of efforts in burying Reagan (this is how it STILL works today).
Yet, Reagan, who campaigned as a STAUNCH, UNAPOLOGETIC Conservative, took 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49.
Arguably, it was the clearest mandate in US election history.
THEN, in 1984, AFTER Reagan PROVED that he was, in fact, a staunch, unapologetic Conservative, he went head to head with team Mondale/Ferraro (extremist Liberals, again).
That election resulted in Reagan taking 525 electoral votes, to Mondale's....15.
THE clearest mandate in US election history.
Was it because Reagan was a Moderate? No.
It was because he was a Conservative; first he campaigned as one, then he PROVED it.
In 2016, Republicans will nominate a candidate to run in an open election.
Make NO mistakes: Democrats will nominate an extremist Liberal: Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Jerry Brown or Gabby Giffords (those are my likely guesses).
If the GOP nominates a "moderate", the Democrats will win.....either way.
The ONLY hope that Republicans have to win in 2016 (and, BTW, begin the process of moving AWAY from Socialism) will be to nominate a SOLID, STAUNCH, UNAPOLOGETIC Conservative.
Mark my words: if the GOP nominates a "moderate", they will LOSE the election, no matter HOW bad the Democrat candidate is.
The choice is YOURS, folks.
If you choose to sit this one out, or NOT educate others, or be an activist at SOME level: YOU effectively vote for Socialism.
.....your children, I'm sure, will thank you.
100% of the person to person debates I have about the upcoming election (2016) revolves around one....and only one....thought:
"The ONLY chance the Republicans have to win is to have a "moderate" run".
I hear this CONSTANTLY. CONSTANTLY!
Well, folks, I'm here to tell you...and them.....that that is WRONG.
In fact, I'll go further:
If the Republicans nominate a Conservative (a REAL Conservative; NOT a CINO), they will win, and they will win BIG!
Crystal ball? Sort of, but MY crystal ball sees the past.
And here's what it sees:
In the 1980 general elections, Jimmy Carter (the SECOND worst President in US history...and an extremist Liberal) was up against Ronald Reagan.
As the incumbent, Carter had the clear advantage (incumbents always do).
In addition, the press, of course, was as the press is now: Liberal to the extreme, which meant that they did EVERYTHING they could to prop up Carter and expended equal or greater amounts of efforts in burying Reagan (this is how it STILL works today).
Yet, Reagan, who campaigned as a STAUNCH, UNAPOLOGETIC Conservative, took 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49.
Arguably, it was the clearest mandate in US election history.
THEN, in 1984, AFTER Reagan PROVED that he was, in fact, a staunch, unapologetic Conservative, he went head to head with team Mondale/Ferraro (extremist Liberals, again).
That election resulted in Reagan taking 525 electoral votes, to Mondale's....15.
THE clearest mandate in US election history.
Was it because Reagan was a Moderate? No.
It was because he was a Conservative; first he campaigned as one, then he PROVED it.
In 2016, Republicans will nominate a candidate to run in an open election.
Make NO mistakes: Democrats will nominate an extremist Liberal: Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Jerry Brown or Gabby Giffords (those are my likely guesses).
If the GOP nominates a "moderate", the Democrats will win.....either way.
The ONLY hope that Republicans have to win in 2016 (and, BTW, begin the process of moving AWAY from Socialism) will be to nominate a SOLID, STAUNCH, UNAPOLOGETIC Conservative.
Mark my words: if the GOP nominates a "moderate", they will LOSE the election, no matter HOW bad the Democrat candidate is.
The choice is YOURS, folks.
If you choose to sit this one out, or NOT educate others, or be an activist at SOME level: YOU effectively vote for Socialism.
.....your children, I'm sure, will thank you.
Things to ask Liberals......
Oh....and make sure you ask PUBLICLY. Make sure EVERYONE either hears, sees or is copied.
......it's an easy way to be an activist.....
So.......Liberals:
Check this (one of MANY stating the data) out:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/01/07/2013-saw-record-gun-background-checks-n1772931
A question:
Why hasn't crime increased to record levels as well?
Why has crime, in fact, gone DOWN (especially in states that allow open or concealed carry)?
Liberals? Hello? Can you answer?
CONSERVATIVES: Spread the word! Ask the question!
......and make it LOUD AND PUBLIC!!!
......it's an easy way to be an activist.....
So.......Liberals:
Check this (one of MANY stating the data) out:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/01/07/2013-saw-record-gun-background-checks-n1772931
A question:
Why hasn't crime increased to record levels as well?
Why has crime, in fact, gone DOWN (especially in states that allow open or concealed carry)?
Liberals? Hello? Can you answer?
CONSERVATIVES: Spread the word! Ask the question!
......and make it LOUD AND PUBLIC!!!
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Seriously, Liberals??? What are you worried about?!?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/10/Obama-vaunted-strategy
I mean.......it's not like he meant a single word of it.....
So don't worry......he and his team gutless academics are STILL......well.....whatever it is that hopes to be a dove when it grows a pair......
I mean.......it's not like he meant a single word of it.....
So don't worry......he and his team gutless academics are STILL......well.....whatever it is that hopes to be a dove when it grows a pair......
Cue the laugh track......
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/world/middleeast/obama-speech-isis.html?_r=0
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Global Warming? Climate Change?
Elections MUST be coming up....
"Global warming" and "climate change" are dominating the news these days. Goofballs like Bob Beckel (at the behest of the DNC) is even screeching that global warming is a greater issue than ISIS.
Seriously....he said that. And he's not alone! It's now becoming one the mandatory talking points of Socialists....sorry, I meant Democrats...in America.
So, let's talk about "global warming" and "climate change".
The fundamental argument is NOT whether the Earth's climate is changing, even though Democrats would have you believe this.
NEWS FLASH: The Earth's climate changes CONSTANTLY. And, throughout history, has swung drastically in the direction of warming AND cooling. (It's typically about a 15,000 year cycle, with 1500 year minor swings....).
What the "global warming", now "climate change", cult would have you believe is that HUMANS are responsible for global warming....now "climate change". It's our modernization and reliance on oil that have choked the atmosphere with carbon dioxide. Where oil isn't sufficient, everything from cows to termites are blamed (again, humans eat lots of cows, then build structures of wood which are eaten by termites....).
My God, the damage that humans have done! We, certainly, are killing our Mother-Earth.
So, let's make some common sense points and ask some common sense questions....
1. If, as Al Gore says ad-nauseum, the "...science of Global Warming is settled!", why did the phrase move from "global warming" to "climate change"? (hint: global mean temperatures have fallen over the last 14 or so years)
2. Why is water vapor (by FAR, the most abundant greenhouse gas) almost NEVER included in global warming studies? (hint: read this: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html)
3. Why has nearly ALL data, showing that global warming.....man-made global warming...either manipulated or suppressed? http://www.naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html
4. When you look through time, comparing atmospheric levels of CO2 vs mean temperature, why is it that high levels of CO2 tend to precede cooling periods? And, how did this even happen, since there was no industry and not many....or any...humans on earth?
5. As I stated (and backed up here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10294082/Global-warming-No-actually-were-cooling-claim-scientists.html ), the Earth is in a cooling cycle. BUT, HOW CAN THIS BE? Democrats claim that man-made high levels of atmospheric CO2 is heating the earth. If that is the case, how CAN the Earth be cooling?
6. How is it that scientists who predict, with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, where the planet's climate will be in 5, 10, 100+ years, cannot predict, with certainty, what the local weather will be like tomorrow?
These are just a few of the oddities, un-addressable by Democrats and other "climate change" worshippers.
Bottom line?
Is "climate change" happening? YES! It always has, since the Earth was formed.
Are humans responsible? NO! Period.
Why are Democrats pushing "climate change"? Easy: it's all about money and power. Convince the weak-minded that humans are responsible for "climate change", and you can tax and regulate them at will; thus increasing Government control of every aspect of your lives.
"Global warming" and "climate change" are dominating the news these days. Goofballs like Bob Beckel (at the behest of the DNC) is even screeching that global warming is a greater issue than ISIS.
Seriously....he said that. And he's not alone! It's now becoming one the mandatory talking points of Socialists....sorry, I meant Democrats...in America.
So, let's talk about "global warming" and "climate change".
The fundamental argument is NOT whether the Earth's climate is changing, even though Democrats would have you believe this.
NEWS FLASH: The Earth's climate changes CONSTANTLY. And, throughout history, has swung drastically in the direction of warming AND cooling. (It's typically about a 15,000 year cycle, with 1500 year minor swings....).
What the "global warming", now "climate change", cult would have you believe is that HUMANS are responsible for global warming....now "climate change". It's our modernization and reliance on oil that have choked the atmosphere with carbon dioxide. Where oil isn't sufficient, everything from cows to termites are blamed (again, humans eat lots of cows, then build structures of wood which are eaten by termites....).
My God, the damage that humans have done! We, certainly, are killing our Mother-Earth.
So, let's make some common sense points and ask some common sense questions....
1. If, as Al Gore says ad-nauseum, the "...science of Global Warming is settled!", why did the phrase move from "global warming" to "climate change"? (hint: global mean temperatures have fallen over the last 14 or so years)
2. Why is water vapor (by FAR, the most abundant greenhouse gas) almost NEVER included in global warming studies? (hint: read this: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html)
3. Why has nearly ALL data, showing that global warming.....man-made global warming...either manipulated or suppressed? http://www.naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html
4. When you look through time, comparing atmospheric levels of CO2 vs mean temperature, why is it that high levels of CO2 tend to precede cooling periods? And, how did this even happen, since there was no industry and not many....or any...humans on earth?
5. As I stated (and backed up here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10294082/Global-warming-No-actually-were-cooling-claim-scientists.html ), the Earth is in a cooling cycle. BUT, HOW CAN THIS BE? Democrats claim that man-made high levels of atmospheric CO2 is heating the earth. If that is the case, how CAN the Earth be cooling?
6. How is it that scientists who predict, with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, where the planet's climate will be in 5, 10, 100+ years, cannot predict, with certainty, what the local weather will be like tomorrow?
These are just a few of the oddities, un-addressable by Democrats and other "climate change" worshippers.
Bottom line?
Is "climate change" happening? YES! It always has, since the Earth was formed.
Are humans responsible? NO! Period.
Why are Democrats pushing "climate change"? Easy: it's all about money and power. Convince the weak-minded that humans are responsible for "climate change", and you can tax and regulate them at will; thus increasing Government control of every aspect of your lives.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Please pass this around to EVERYONE
This isn't so much about the difference between President Bush and Obama.
Rather, this is about the difference between Republicans and Democrats.
Please remember this when it comes time to vote.
http://youtu.be/nbLEDNIe6n0
Rather, this is about the difference between Republicans and Democrats.
Please remember this when it comes time to vote.
http://youtu.be/nbLEDNIe6n0
Thursday, September 4, 2014
Conservatives: this is a teaching moment....
Check out this article:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/19/Trendy-High-End-Los-Angeles-Restaurant-Adds-Three-Percent-Tax-for-Obamacare
Now, check out this report:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/higher-fast-food-wages-higher-fast-food-prices
You're, hopefully, seeing these kinds of things nationwide. "Hopefully" not in their happening, but rather "hopefully" in your noticing.
And notice you SHOULD, because these incidences are PERFECT teaching moments.
And you, me, we ALL should be taking time to educate those who CAN be educated (hint: NOT Liberals). Think Independents. Think GOP moderates. Think ANYONE WHO WOULD EVER CONSIDER VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT.
How often do you hear a Democrat promising to "tax the wealthy" or "tax only the highest wage earners"? In street terms, you hear "soak the rich".
It's a constant theme to the Democrat Party rhetoric.
And, let's get this straight: THIS IS 100% DEMOCRAT PARTY. The ONLY Republicans might....MIGHT....hint at taxes targeted at "the rich" are Liberals, calling themselves Republicans (think John McCain and Scott Brown).
Here's the problem:
When "the rich" get taxed (or "big corporate", for that matter), they pass those taxes on TO YOU!
Why do you think the cost of goods and services, over the last two years, have increased 30%???
So, American voters (the ones who vote "D"), when you vote for someone because that person is promising to stick it to the rich, you are, in fact, sticking it to yourself! And, you're sticking it to the poor.
If you, American voter, REALLY want to improve the fiscal lives and health of the poor and middle class, then improve their buying power. And the ONLY way to do that is to lower taxes across the board.
Lowering taxes does two HUGE things (not the only things, but these are two biggies):
1. Lower taxes effectively increase YOUR wages, since you keep more of your hard-earned money.
2. Lower taxes LOWERS PRICES for goods and services......which increase your wages EVEN FURTHER!
Democrats KNOW, for fact, that you aren't going to do the research. They are banking on it. And, for many years, they've been exactly right.
PLEASE. I implore you.......pass this around. Educate people. Go head to head with Liberals (it's really ok to do that).
For God's sake: GET ACTIVE!
Or, FOR SURE, you will lose your freedoms and liberty.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/19/Trendy-High-End-Los-Angeles-Restaurant-Adds-Three-Percent-Tax-for-Obamacare
Now, check out this report:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/higher-fast-food-wages-higher-fast-food-prices
You're, hopefully, seeing these kinds of things nationwide. "Hopefully" not in their happening, but rather "hopefully" in your noticing.
And notice you SHOULD, because these incidences are PERFECT teaching moments.
And you, me, we ALL should be taking time to educate those who CAN be educated (hint: NOT Liberals). Think Independents. Think GOP moderates. Think ANYONE WHO WOULD EVER CONSIDER VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT.
How often do you hear a Democrat promising to "tax the wealthy" or "tax only the highest wage earners"? In street terms, you hear "soak the rich".
It's a constant theme to the Democrat Party rhetoric.
And, let's get this straight: THIS IS 100% DEMOCRAT PARTY. The ONLY Republicans might....MIGHT....hint at taxes targeted at "the rich" are Liberals, calling themselves Republicans (think John McCain and Scott Brown).
Here's the problem:
When "the rich" get taxed (or "big corporate", for that matter), they pass those taxes on TO YOU!
Why do you think the cost of goods and services, over the last two years, have increased 30%???
So, American voters (the ones who vote "D"), when you vote for someone because that person is promising to stick it to the rich, you are, in fact, sticking it to yourself! And, you're sticking it to the poor.
If you, American voter, REALLY want to improve the fiscal lives and health of the poor and middle class, then improve their buying power. And the ONLY way to do that is to lower taxes across the board.
Lowering taxes does two HUGE things (not the only things, but these are two biggies):
1. Lower taxes effectively increase YOUR wages, since you keep more of your hard-earned money.
2. Lower taxes LOWERS PRICES for goods and services......which increase your wages EVEN FURTHER!
Democrats KNOW, for fact, that you aren't going to do the research. They are banking on it. And, for many years, they've been exactly right.
PLEASE. I implore you.......pass this around. Educate people. Go head to head with Liberals (it's really ok to do that).
For God's sake: GET ACTIVE!
Or, FOR SURE, you will lose your freedoms and liberty.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Seriously, folks.....
The world, especially the terrorist world, is laughing.
The only things missing are the "Kick Me" signs, the "I'm with stupid" t-shirts (for both of them) and the propeller hats.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/GOP-remarks-blatant-inconsistencies/2014/09/03/id/592491/
The only things missing are the "Kick Me" signs, the "I'm with stupid" t-shirts (for both of them) and the propeller hats.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/GOP-remarks-blatant-inconsistencies/2014/09/03/id/592491/
Looks like Liberals will FINALLY give a crap about the War on Terror......
If it hasn't been obvious enough to Americans, Liberals don't give a rat's ass about how many soldiers are killed or injured in the War on Terror.
But, now, it would seem that they're about to take notice.....
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/03/Trapped--then-poisoned--Kabuls-ruthless-dog-cull
But, now, it would seem that they're about to take notice.....
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/03/Trapped--then-poisoned--Kabuls-ruthless-dog-cull
Why? I'll tell you why.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2014/09/02/in-alaska-and-texas-democrats-struggle-to-pin-their-willie-horton-ads-on-republicans-n1886502?_sm_au_=iHVqn5DTJV8qHFQP
Willie Horton will forever be a stunning example of Democrat failure. If you DON'T know the real, ACTUAL, COMPLETE story of Willie, you should do yourself a favor and do some research.
The reason that Democrats in Alaska and Texas are drawing a line between Willie and Republicans is BECAUSE voters haven't bothered to do the research.....the COMPLETE research. (And, when you do the research, MAKE SURE that you read the history of the changes in the furlough law....that's where the idiot Dukakis comes in....)
But, this is not unusual for Democrats.
In fact, they do it ALL the time, relying on the fact.....not opinion, mind you, but FACT....that their supporters are willfully ignorant and are not inclined to believe the truth EVEN WHEN IT IS HANDED TO THEM.
Other examples? Sure:
Comparing Hitler to Republicans. (Hitler headed the National SOCIALIST Party, whose platform was nearly identical to that of the Democrat Party).
Comparing Theophilus Eugene "Bull" Connor to the Republican Party. (Bull Connor was a Democrat.)
Comparing the Ku Klux Klan to the Republican Party. (The KKK (the modern incarnation) was FOUNDED by the Democrat Party. In fact, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd was a former recruiter for the KKK and a KKK member himself.)
Comparing the Republican Party to slaveholders and defenders of slavery. (It was the Republican Party that ENDED slavery. In addition, it was the Republican Party that ensured the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; overcoming a Democrat Party filibuster in order to gain passage).
These are just a few examples.
And, folks, when you HOPEFULLY do the history, what you'll find is this:
None of these were a "Republican" thing. And none of these were a "well, BOTH sides are guilty of it" thing.
No.
All these, REMARKABLE, EGREGIOUS, INHUMAN policies and practices were 100% Democrat Party.
ONE HUNDRED PERCENT DEMOCRAT PARTY.
The history is ABSOLUTELY clear.
Willie Horton will forever be a stunning example of Democrat failure. If you DON'T know the real, ACTUAL, COMPLETE story of Willie, you should do yourself a favor and do some research.
The reason that Democrats in Alaska and Texas are drawing a line between Willie and Republicans is BECAUSE voters haven't bothered to do the research.....the COMPLETE research. (And, when you do the research, MAKE SURE that you read the history of the changes in the furlough law....that's where the idiot Dukakis comes in....)
But, this is not unusual for Democrats.
In fact, they do it ALL the time, relying on the fact.....not opinion, mind you, but FACT....that their supporters are willfully ignorant and are not inclined to believe the truth EVEN WHEN IT IS HANDED TO THEM.
Other examples? Sure:
Comparing Hitler to Republicans. (Hitler headed the National SOCIALIST Party, whose platform was nearly identical to that of the Democrat Party).
Comparing Theophilus Eugene "Bull" Connor to the Republican Party. (Bull Connor was a Democrat.)
Comparing the Ku Klux Klan to the Republican Party. (The KKK (the modern incarnation) was FOUNDED by the Democrat Party. In fact, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd was a former recruiter for the KKK and a KKK member himself.)
Comparing the Republican Party to slaveholders and defenders of slavery. (It was the Republican Party that ENDED slavery. In addition, it was the Republican Party that ensured the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; overcoming a Democrat Party filibuster in order to gain passage).
These are just a few examples.
And, folks, when you HOPEFULLY do the history, what you'll find is this:
None of these were a "Republican" thing. And none of these were a "well, BOTH sides are guilty of it" thing.
No.
All these, REMARKABLE, EGREGIOUS, INHUMAN policies and practices were 100% Democrat Party.
ONE HUNDRED PERCENT DEMOCRAT PARTY.
The history is ABSOLUTELY clear.
Let's recap....
So, where does America stand:
- We continue to have runaway unemployment, with NO fixes in sight
- Our national debt is escalating out of control
- Our budget deficits are completely out of control
- Our borders are being violated by vicious gangs, terrorists and, likely, weapons of mass destruction.
- Obamacare continues to fail, EPICALLY
- Our foreign policy is non-existent
- Our domestic policy is.....non-existent
- Our public schools continue to set records for low achievement, while they absorb ever-increasing budget money; NONE of which ends up with the students (it ALL goes to the administrators and unions).
- Businesses, large and small, are leaving the country in droves
- Racial tension is at (arguably) the highest levels in history
- The gap between the richest and the poorest is at the widest in history
- There are now MORE "poor" in America than there were before "the war on poverty" began
- Black unemployment, female unemployment, teen unemployment.....all at or near historic highs
- More people on food stamps than ever before
- More people on welfare than ever before
- More people on disability than ever before
- Christianity and the Second Amendment are being systematically dismantled by judicial and executive caveat
-
And we have daily headlines like these:
Nearly 1 in 10 California workers are illegals...
Obama pushes 'immigration rights' for foreigners...
Judge Sets Hearings -- In 4 Years!
REPORT: All job gains in NC since 2000 went to immigrants...
Feds sign agreement with Mexico to protect workers 'regardless of status'...
'Manageable Problem'...
11 commercial jetliners missing after Islamist takeover of Tripoli airport...
Folks, it's called "scorched earth" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scorched-earth).
That is what Saddam did when, while retreating from Kuwait, he had all the oil fields torched.
And, it's what the Democrats are doing right now, in anticipation of the next two elections. They are destroying EVERYTHING THEY CAN.
Their plan, now, is to leave America un-fixable, enable to return to greatness, unable to recover from the third-world status they have achieved.
What the Democrats are doing is tantamount to the husband who, after he kills his wife, says, "If I can't have her, NO ONE CAN!".
Such is the nature of Socialism.
Such is the nature of The Democrat Party.
The only question remaining is:
What are YOU, PERSONALLY, going to do about it?
(Or, doesn't freedom, liberty and security mean anything to you?)
- We continue to have runaway unemployment, with NO fixes in sight
- Our national debt is escalating out of control
- Our budget deficits are completely out of control
- Our borders are being violated by vicious gangs, terrorists and, likely, weapons of mass destruction.
- Obamacare continues to fail, EPICALLY
- Our foreign policy is non-existent
- Our domestic policy is.....non-existent
- Our public schools continue to set records for low achievement, while they absorb ever-increasing budget money; NONE of which ends up with the students (it ALL goes to the administrators and unions).
- Businesses, large and small, are leaving the country in droves
- Racial tension is at (arguably) the highest levels in history
- The gap between the richest and the poorest is at the widest in history
- There are now MORE "poor" in America than there were before "the war on poverty" began
- Black unemployment, female unemployment, teen unemployment.....all at or near historic highs
- More people on food stamps than ever before
- More people on welfare than ever before
- More people on disability than ever before
- Christianity and the Second Amendment are being systematically dismantled by judicial and executive caveat
-
And we have daily headlines like these:
Nearly 1 in 10 California workers are illegals...
Obama pushes 'immigration rights' for foreigners...
Judge Sets Hearings -- In 4 Years!
REPORT: All job gains in NC since 2000 went to immigrants...
Feds sign agreement with Mexico to protect workers 'regardless of status'...
'Manageable Problem'...
11 commercial jetliners missing after Islamist takeover of Tripoli airport...
Folks, it's called "scorched earth" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scorched-earth).
That is what Saddam did when, while retreating from Kuwait, he had all the oil fields torched.
And, it's what the Democrats are doing right now, in anticipation of the next two elections. They are destroying EVERYTHING THEY CAN.
Their plan, now, is to leave America un-fixable, enable to return to greatness, unable to recover from the third-world status they have achieved.
What the Democrats are doing is tantamount to the husband who, after he kills his wife, says, "If I can't have her, NO ONE CAN!".
Such is the nature of Socialism.
Such is the nature of The Democrat Party.
The only question remaining is:
What are YOU, PERSONALLY, going to do about it?
(Or, doesn't freedom, liberty and security mean anything to you?)
Dukakis, 2014
Anyone remember this photo:
It's Michael Dukakis, former Governor of Massachusetts, who ran for President in '88. His then campaign manager, Susan Estrich, in a desperate attempt to make him look like a hawk (an impossible feat), had this photo arranged.
It, along with the real story of Willie Horton, became the punch lines on what was perhaps the worst-run campaign in history.
Fast forward to 2014, and we have THIS gem:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/politics/joe-biden-isis-gates-of-hell/
I laugh louder every time I watch it!
But it's kinda funny, really......neither he, nor his boss, the gutless-capitulator-in-chief, have said ANYTHING about "defeating" ISIL, ISIS, al Qaeda....whatever.
Now...anyone who know Biden....well, really, ANY and EVERY Democrat.....knows that his badass words are meaningless. Worthless. Biden is a coward. He's never proven or demonstrated otherwise.
The ONLY thing that could have made this more funny is if Oama had said it (instead of hiding, while he sent "The Forehead" to become the butt of a joke).
I WILL give credit to Joe for one thing, though.....
He DOES look kinda lifelike, even WITH the botox and dolls hair.
It's Michael Dukakis, former Governor of Massachusetts, who ran for President in '88. His then campaign manager, Susan Estrich, in a desperate attempt to make him look like a hawk (an impossible feat), had this photo arranged.
It, along with the real story of Willie Horton, became the punch lines on what was perhaps the worst-run campaign in history.
Fast forward to 2014, and we have THIS gem:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/politics/joe-biden-isis-gates-of-hell/
I laugh louder every time I watch it!
But it's kinda funny, really......neither he, nor his boss, the gutless-capitulator-in-chief, have said ANYTHING about "defeating" ISIL, ISIS, al Qaeda....whatever.
Now...anyone who know Biden....well, really, ANY and EVERY Democrat.....knows that his badass words are meaningless. Worthless. Biden is a coward. He's never proven or demonstrated otherwise.
The ONLY thing that could have made this more funny is if Oama had said it (instead of hiding, while he sent "The Forehead" to become the butt of a joke).
I WILL give credit to Joe for one thing, though.....
He DOES look kinda lifelike, even WITH the botox and dolls hair.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)