So....did you notice yet?

Quite honestly, I haven't read...or seen...or heard.....of ANYONE noticing yet. And, if they have, they haven't been SHOUTING about it.

..which bothers me.

Most recently, in the third debate, the Benghazi situation came up (of course). Romney, surprisingly, left it pretty much alone; opting instead to take the high ground. Fine. It worked, obviously.

Obama, on the other hand, desperately seeking a way out, discussed how quickly and evenly his administration reacted to the initial reports.

.....so....did you notice yet?  Or, like everyone else, did you miss it?

What no one seems to be paying attention to is that in the case of Benghazi, LIKE EVERYTHING IN HIS ADMINISTRATION, the only actions he EVENTUALLY took were in REACTION to the event.

Obama's career, like Clinton's before him, was built on smoke and mirrors; avoid avoid avoid, until you have no choice, then avoid some more.

And, if the "sh** hits the fan", blame blame blame.

"Reaction" isn't leadership, if "PROACTION" was never there.

Obama's administration (the supreme idiot Hillary) SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROACTIVE; not only in Benghazi, but ALL AROUND THE MIDDLE EAST.

Those places, where America is, ARE SOVEREIGN GROUND.

That attack was an act of war. It wasn't a crime. IT WAS AN ATTACK ON AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY.

And this idiot....Obama....treats it as a crime.

PROACTION, folks. NOT reaction.

Please God, give us a President who leads from the front, is decisive and PROactive. In other words:

GIVE US MITT ROMNEY.

Hirota: out.